Author Archives: mha

2011 Charleston National Genealogical Society report

Published by:

MHA at National Genealogical Society 2011

Charleston, SC

MHA’s four day presence at NGS was the perfect antidote to any perception we might have had that our interests are a small niche, relevant only to a tiny percentage of Americans.   Julie Williams Dixon’s showing of Melungeon Voices on the first night of the conference drew a sizeable audience, as did Terry Mullins’s lecture presentation on Melungeons, “Cultural Diversity Comes Home.”  But the combined 150 or so attendance at these programs was dwarfed by the number of people who visited the MHA booth in the exhibit hall.   Most of the hundred and twenty booths were hosted by vendors of books and online databases, or local and state genealogical societies.  The MHA booth was consistently once of the most visited, and often was swarmed by visitors between the sessions for genealogists.  Perhaps this was partly due to the fact that we had three authors and one filmmaker at the booth.  Terry Mullins, Frank Sweet, Julie Williams Dixon, and I all spent hours responding to inquiries, as did S.J. Arthur, Elizabeth Williams, and Mary Lee Sweet.   But all this activity was from the 1600 registered conferees who had paid to attend the event.  On the final day, more than 600 more people arrived for free genealogy classes offered by ancestry.com, and they greatly increased the traffic in the exhibit hall.   The influx of new people kept all of us busy answering nonstop questions; the most frequent being simply “What is a Melungeon?”  Each of us heard story after story about mixed ancestry backgrounds, or family secrets and mysteries that hinted at such.  We left feeling that the interest shown in the past for MHA’s work is only the tip of the iceberg and many thousands of Americans continue to discover that their own ancestry is more complicated than they had suspected.
One of the questions asked at the showing of Melungeon Voices was about the connection of the Melungeon story to the new book by Daniel Sharfstein, The Invisible Line.  This provided an opening for MHA to announce the author’s participation as a featured speaker at 15th Union.

11th Union Report

Published by:

Before 1607? Melungeons in the New World”

Southwest Virginia Museum, Bigs Stone Gap, 29-30 June 2007

The Melungeon Heritage Association (MHA) and the Southwest Virginia Museum sponsored Before 1607? Melungeons in the New World in conjunction with Virginia’s statewide celebration of the 400th anniversary of the founding of Jamestown.

Southwest Virginia Museum

A reception on Friday evening, June 29th, featured music by Ron Short. Short, a native of the Appalachian Mountains of Dickenson County, Virginia, has worked at Roadside Theater for the past 26 years as a playwright, musician, composer, actor, and director. He scripted and wrote music for 15 musical plays and helped script three others, all currently in Roadside’s touring repertoire. He performs in all of the company’s touring productions.

Speakers on Saturday, June 30, inclulded:
Lisa Alther, best-selling novelist and author of the new memoir Kinfolks: Falling Off the Family Tree; The Search for My Melungeon Ancestors
Jack Goins
Wayne Winkler, author of Walking Toward the Sunset: The Melungeons of Appalachia
Katherine Vande Brake, author of How They Shine: Melungeon Characters in the Fiction of Appalachia
Terry Mullins, researcher, author, and lecturer
Toney Kirk, researcher and MHA board member

Storyteller Linda Goodman
Jim Glanville, respearcher of early Spanish and a Portuguese explorations in southwest Virginia
Turker Ozdogan, artist and Turkish historian
Mattie Ruth Johsnon, author of My Melungeon Heritage

…and more.

The Southwest Virginia Museum was an excellent location; The grounds are beautiful, and the perfect weather didn’t hurt either. Organizers expected 200 or so and wound up with close to 400 –not counting guests, presenters, MHA staff, etc. Naturally., MHA organizers were quite pleased.

There were many highlights to the event, but of course Julie Dixon’s documentary Melungeon Voices was certainly a long-awaited pleasure. She’s put in a lot of time and effort and it shows. She set out to tell Brent Kennedy;s story, of course, but Brent also wanted a balance of viewpoints in this film and Julie achieved that admirably. The running time clocked in at 1 hour 6 minutes, but Julie assures me that if someone like PBS, History Channel, or Discovery Channel picked it up, it could be tightened to fit their time requirements without significant loss of content. I hope it can be seen by a much larger audience in the very near future.

We had a nice room for viewing the film – good sight lines, good audio, not too much ambient light – but it could only seat 50 people. We had a sneak preview Friday evening and another showing on Saturday afternoon, but it was obvious that our planned third showing – and even our stand-by plan of a fourth showing – wouldn’t satisfy the demand for the film. Plus the original room was difficult for Brent to get into. So Julie and her cinematographer Warren Gentry made a last minute move of the entire set-up into the tent, and MHA decided to forgo a discussion session so that we could all see the film before it got too late. It was a good move; Brent was able to see the movie front and center, and everyone who stayed had the opportunity to see it.

Brent’s presence was, of course, very touching for all of us. It was 10 years ago next month that the first Melungeon gathering took place in Wise, Virginia. Few would argue with the idea that he has done more than any individual to stimulate interest in the Melungeons. While Brent’s voice is (for now) stilled and his body is damaged, he is still completely Brent Kennedy, and we certainly have not heard the last of him. His presence in Big Stone Gap was an inspiration to us all, as has been his work for the past decade or more.

The Bluestar Dance Troupe


Bluestar Dance Troupe was founded by Zeki Maviyildiz, who has been sharing his vast experience and talents with his friends. Despite being a new dance group, Bluestar Dance Troupe has introduced Turkish Folk Dances to many audiences. They present a variety of Turkish folk dance pieces from traditional dances to modern choreographies keeping the spirit of the dance. They will be performing Saturday afternoon at 2:15 at the event, and again Saturday evening at Mosby’s in nearby Wise, along with music from the Kennedy Brothers.

The Bluestar Dance Troupe was amazing. They perform a combination of traditional and modern Turkish dance and the result is quite breathtaking. For those of us at Mosby’s on Saturday night, we got an even more entertaining show with not only the addition of the music of the Kennedy Brothers but some quite entertaining audience participation.

We distributed surveys to attendees about what they would like to see in future gatherings. We really want input from those who attend, and those who might attend if we offered more of what they want. Feel free to send suggestions to me atwinklerw@etsu.edu. Keep in mind that we’re a volunteer organization with a very small budget—if you think we need we need a team of genealogists or other sort of experts on hand for workshops, be prepared to be one of them, OK?

Thanks again to all who attended. Those of you who have presentations in electronic form, just send them to me if you’d like us to add them to the website. And PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE send pictures! Best wishes to all, and we’ll have another great get-together next year!

Wayne Winkler
Melungeon Heritage Association

12th Union Report

Published by:

Twelfth Union: A Melungeon Gathering

It might appear to many of you watching this site that we went on vacation after our gathering at LincolnMemorial University.  In some ways we did!  We are all dedicated volunteers and put off many things in our own lives until after our gatherings.  So, we had to play catch up in our lives, families and communities.
We have also been at work completing the many post event chores required each year as well as starting to plan 13th Union.  Still, we need to let those who attended, presented or assisted in any way, as well as those unable to attend this year, know how much MHA appreciates your dedication.  MHA acknowledges all the talented and supportive people who work to make the events happen; you help us and others piece together the myriad of stories and families who are part of this tapestry.
Lincoln Memorial University staff worked from before our arrival until our departure to ensure that those attending the gathering had their needs met.   Presenters included authors Lisa Alther, Elizabeth Hirschman, K. Paul Johnson, Frank Sweet and LMU’s own, Larry Thacker.
Musical entertainment, both formal and informal, was provided by guitarist, Randy Williams & friends; Frank & Mary Lee Sweet of Backintyme Performances, and Jeanne Bornefeld.
Historians Earl Hess and Ron Bryant contributed greatly to our event by providing the historical prospective to a variety of subjects.   Film maker, Julie Williams Dixon, showed her highly acclaimed film,Melungeon Voices, to a packed audience and had her film available for sale for the first time.  To get your own copy, contact Julie at her site.
Researchers (and MHA Board members) Terry Mullins and Toney Kirk also presented programs regarding Melungeon heritage.  We were also well informed on North Carolina connections by researcher,Todd Beckham.  He and author, K. Paul Johnson, discovered family and community connections through each others presentations. Similar connections were made during informal chat groups where participants could discuss regional and familial connections. Our own Lifetime Achievement recipient, Johnnie Rhea, again delighted her audience with stories of her Melungeon experience.  Panel discussions participants,Marilyn Cheney, Helen Campbell, as well as others, addressed issues common to us all in celebrating identity.
Vardy Community Historical Society displayed their exquisite photographic collection and gave a presentation on the Vardy Community. Stacy Webb and Gabe Gabeheart from the Redbone Heritage Foundation each educated us with regard to their group as well as the similar connections and questions that exist for many mixed ancestry groups.   Jim Gifford of the Jesse Stuart Foundation also talked about Jesse Stuart as an individual, a writer and the story behind Deutsia of Daughter of the Legend (the real Barney Green). Jesse Stuart Foundation volunteers even helped at the sales table for two days giving us the opportunity to learn about their mission.  Sue Collins again, in her quietly effective manner, provided amusement and old fashioned education to the young ones through games of days gone by.  She is an example of the family of participants and volunteers who form A Melungeon Gathering.
Brent Kennedy’s presence during a portion of the weekend reminded many of us of the inspiration he has always provided to get beyond the factors that divide people, so as to concentrate on those that unite us.
At our yearly meeting, Lisa Alther about brought down the house with her succinct statement (to the delight of a surprised MHA Board) as she got to the heart of the matter of what MHA stands for.  She said that she had not joined any group since the Queen Teens of Kingsport until now.  She went on to say she had just joined MHA, at our first formal membership drive in years, because it was the first group where she didn’t have to hate anybody!
We concluded the yearly meeting with awards to a few more who so richly deserve recognition.  Founders Awards were given to Audie Kennedy, who was the first MHA president, and to Brent KennedyLifetime Achievement Awards were presented to Thelma Eanes, Wanda Loomis and Irene Wright. Two previous recipients, Claude Collins and Johnnie Rhea, joined in welcoming their new cohorts.
We concluded the gathering by … what else? … gathering informally outside our dorm rooms and singing the night away with the Sweets and Jeanne providing the music.   Even with traffic tie ups from extensive highway construction as well as medical emergencies resulting in a two cancelled speakers, we worked in concert to provide a quality program, in our tradition of sanctuary to a multitude of voices.
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Now, doesn’t all this make you want to sign up now for next year? MHA is having a planning session in early November for the 2009 gatheringWe have already set the dates of 26th and 27th of June at Chief Logan Lodge in Logan, WV so please mark your calendars.  Further details will be posted here and in our newsletter soon after the planning session.

14th Union Report

Published by:

The 14th Melungeon Union was extended to three days to allow for a full day celebrating the historic Melungeon community of Vardy.  The geographical scope of subjects also expanded, ranging from east Texas to northwest Ohio to northeastern North Carolina.  While the historic Melungeon heartland of northeast Tennessee and southwest Virginia remains home to MHA, we continue to include mixed ancestry peoples all across America in our Unions.  85 conferees attended the Union, coming from Tennessee and Virginia as well as Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, North and South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Texas and the District of Columbia.

The Union opened formally on the morning of Thursday June 24 after an informal gathering in the previous evening. The event began with a welcome and introductions by SJ Arthur and the MHA Board of Directors.  The first scholarly presentation was by Dr. Terry Mullins of Concord University who gave a survey of what is known and speculated about the history and roots of the Melungeon people.  The morning session closed with a detailed explanation by Backintyme publisher Frank W. Sweet on “racial” classification in the US Census from 1790-2010.   The afternoon session opened with an international musical program with many traditional instruments by Jeanne Bornefeld.  Johnnie Gibson Rhea followed by sharing her family and community history of growing up on Newman’s Ridge in Hancock County.  Todd Beckham closed the afternoon with a detailed analysis of genealogical and DNA connections between Hancock County Melungeons and his 18th century Collins and Bunch ancestral families of Bertie County, North Carolina.  After dinner the conferees enjoyed a collection of outtakes from Julie Williams Dixon’s Melungeon Voices, featuring Melungeons from Hancock County, and a reception following hosted by Claude Collins, Rose Trent, and Johnnie Rhea.  A feeling of common purpose and shared exploration was nurtured in our activities the first day, and strengthened on the second day of the Union. Dr. Mullins’s introduction to Melungeons served as an ideal way to open the conference, and Frank Sweet’s survey of census “racial” classification was a masterpiece of thorough research delivered in an engaging and succinct manner.  The musical presentation by Jeanne Bornefeld was a tour de force, something entirely new for MHA and both entertaining and educational.  Johnnie Rhea is a beloved elder of the Melungeon community and no Union would be complete without a chance to share her memories of life in Hancock County.  Todd Beckham’s explanation of the relationship between the Bunch and Collins families of North Carolina and the Melungeons of Tennessee and Virginia brought together many threads that were of great interest to our diverse membership.  Thursday night’s showing of outtakes fromMelungeon Voices provided an ideal preparation for our day at Vardy.  The carefully selected excerpts of Hancock County Melungeon interviews showed how attitudes had evolved during the twentieth century as prejudice against Melungeons diminished and pride replaced shame.  Mattie Ruth Johnson, who did not appear in the final film, was especially eloquent in the interview we watched.

As soon as we completed breakfast Friday morning we were off on a one hour scenic mountain drive to the Vardy Church and Museum where graduates of Vardy Presbyterian School welcomed us with reminiscences of life at the school.  Claude Collins, DruAnna Williams Overbay, Troy Williams and Rose Trent had attended the school over a twenty-five year period and told stories about what it was like at different times during the mid-twentieth century.  After a break for box lunches provided by our hosts the Vardy Community Historical Society, author Katherine Vande Brake spoke about her work and issues in Melungeon history, to a very appreciative audience many of whom had read her recent book Through the Back Door.  Conferees then spent an hour exploring the site, with tours of the cabin of Mahala Mullins, the church and museum, and a walking tour of other nearby sites in Vardy Valley including the ruins of the school.  After returning to LMU for dinner, we ended the day with a keynote address on the Tuscarora diaspora by Professor Arwin D. Smallwood of the University of Memphis.  He expanded on his presentation from 13th Union and with abundant maps illustrated the Tuscarora presence throughout the eastern US. The day we spent in Vardy was perfect in every way; the weather was pleasantly cool after a heat wave, and VCHS had organized everything to make the day informative and pleasurable.  The panel of former students from the Vardy school was an ideal opening, as we were given the flavor of the school from the 1940s through the 1960s by different students.  Katie Vande Brake’s talk was thoughtful and inspiring, and afterwards we heard nothing but raves from conferees about Vardy and VCHS. The organization has done a splendid job of restoring and preserving community history, and no amount of thanks could be sufficient for all they did to make the day memorable.

The final day of the Union opened with four authors of Carolina Genesis: Beyond the Color Line in a symposium.  Cyndie Goins Hoelscher spoke about the Goins family in North Carolina and Texas; Scott Withrow traced the career of Rev. Joseph Willis who was born a North Carolina slave and died a White Texan; Marvin T. Jones described 250 year history of free people of color in Hertford County, NC; and I concluded with a description of the political forces leading to the 19thc extinction of Quakerism in a county founded by Quakers in the 17thc. Wayne Winkler ended the morning session with a fascinating report of ongoing research on the historical drama “Walk Toward the Sunset.”  Jameson Jones, who just graduated from Roanoke College and is entering the Appalachian Studies Master’s program at Appalachian State University, opened the Saturday afternoon session presenting results of a survey of Melungeon-identified individuals.  Dr. Jill Rowe of Virginia Commonwealth University concluded the scholarly presentations with a report of groundbreaking research on 19th century Melungeon communities in northwestern Ohio.  S.J. Arthur presided over the MHA Annual Meeting, with the topic Claiming Kin: Unions, Associations and Mixed Heritage.

Saturday was the day that new research was highlighted, and the first speaker Cyndie Goins Hoelscher was a Texan researching North Carolina Goins ancestors.  To our surprise and delight our final research presentation on Saturday was also by a member of this diverse family.  Only during her fascinating historical talk did we learn that Dr. Jill Rowe was part of the Goings family which figured prominently in her description of Melungeon communities in northwest Ohio. Scott Withrow’s presentation on Joseph Willis, like Cyndie’s on the Goinses, focused on mixed ancestry individuals and families who left North Carolina in the early 19th century.  Marvin Jones’s talk on the Winton Triangle celebrated a community that would not leave the county where they were landowners from the 1740s, regardless of all the pressures making mixed ancestry peoples feel unwelcome in the state.  It was a pleasure to meet Wayne Winkler, author of the most respected book about Melungeons, and to hear something of his forthcoming book; his enthusiasm for the subject matter was evident in his presentation and he left us looking forward to a future Union where he will be able to sign copies of the completed book.  Jameson Jones was a first time presenter to the Union, bringing a sociological perspective to Melungeon identity and providing a welcome youthful presence to the event.  As he begins studies for a Master’s in Appalachian Studies, MHA welcomes him as a new consultant to the board.  Also announced as new consultants were Marvin T. Jones, Arwin Smallwood, Scott Withrow, and Mary Lee Sweet whose videography has been a huge contribution to MHA for several years.  MHA strives to encourage fellowship and scholarship equally, celebrating the heritage of Melungeons and kindred groups while promoting study of their history.   14th Union struck a balance between celebration and scholarly research that I hope we can sustain in the future.   

The annual MHA meeting, chaired by president S.J. Arthur, provided discussion of future Unions, which the board will take into consideration as we begin plans for 2011. We are also encouraged by the verdict of Johnnie Gibson Rhea that 2010 was “the best event ever” hosted by MHA, and very grateful to all the members who helped to make it so.

13th Union Report

Published by:

13th MHA Union Nurtures Scholarship and Fellowship

A year ago I posted on my Backintyme blog that the Melungeon Heritage Association had hosted a successful and harmonious 12th Union, and that my presentations on Pell Mellers were well received.  Since then, I have become a consultant to the MHA board and was involved in the planning for the 13th Union, just completed in West Virginia.  We already have improvements in mind for 2010, but there seems to be a general consensus that 2009 was remarkably successful both in scholarly content and in creating an inclusive, welcoming atmosphere.  Some presentations provided abundant food for thought; others nurtured our feelings of solidarity among mixed-ancestry groups; most did both.  There are some areas where we need improvement, but for an all-volunteer group whose board only meets a few times per year, MHA put on an exemplary conference.  Conferees had gathered informally on Thursday evening at Chief Logan Conference Center in Logan, West Virginia, a venue that provided abundant meeting space and excellent accommodations.  New friendships were formed throughout the conference, and old friendships were renewed.   As conferees arrived they were welcomed with a concert by Logan County musician Roger Bryant, whose lyrics and music encapsulated the culture of the Mountain State.

After welcoming remarks from the Logan County Commissioners and Chamber of Commerce, the first presentation was by Adam Hodges, West Virginia Director of Museums.  He led us on a visual tour through the new West Virginia State Museum, which just opened to the public the week before the Union.  Its design incorporates many state-of-the-art museum features, and I was motivated to return to West Virginia to visit the outstanding facility.  Visitors follow a path which begins in prehistoric times with an introduction to Appalachian geology, and are led through a chronological series of galleries depicting different eras in state history.  The second presentation of the morning was Melungeons 101 by Dr. Terry Mullins.  Terry is a Professor of Education at Concord University, and demonstrated his mastery of education technology with a superb power point presentation covering what is known of Melungeon history and the many unknowns that continue to intrigue researchers.  His program was so helpful in introducing newcomers to the Melungeon story that I would like to see it featured at all forthcoming Unions.  He has presented it to many other groups, most recently to an educational conference in Nevada, and made it so entertaining and informative that veteran MHA conference-goers enjoyed it as much as those new to the subject.  Dr. Elizabeth Hirschman of Rutgers University closed out the morning sessions with an intriguing and very current report on DNA profiling of the Appalachian Melungeon community.  She is a very lively and amusing presenter, whose enthusiasm for her subject matter was infectious.   It is hard to imagine any student falling asleep in one of her classes!  She had just gotten DNA Fingerprint profiles of her own parents, which she discussed along with her own matches to give a vivid picture of the complexity of Melungeon genetic heritage.  In addition to matches from Africa that suggest sub-Saharan admixture, Beth has found abundant evidence of Gypsy ancestry along with Mediterranean matches that are often found in Southerners with mixed ancestry. Since my own DNA Tribes profile, just received in June, points to Mediterranean Gypsy ancestry, I was especially fascinated by Beth’s discussion of the Spanish Inquisition and its effects on migration to the New World.

The Friday afternoon session opened with a very heartfelt, moving presentation by Dr. Irene Wright, who discovered her Melungeon heritage as an adult thanks to Brent Kennedy’s book Melungeons: Resurrection of a Proud People.  Growing up in the coal fields of eastern Kentucky, Irene experienced discrimination from both white and black communities, and found comfort and security only within her own multicolored Moore family.  Although classified with many different racial and color labels in the past, Dr. Wright rejects them all and gave an inspiring call to the audience to join her in rising above them: “We are not ONE thing, we are EVERYTHING!”   Her presentation concluded with a slide presentation of family history that gave us a sense of why she had accomplished so much in a distinguished academic career.  Even without the support of a community, her extended family gave her the self-respect and drive that were so evident in her presentation to the Union.  The afternoon presentations continued with a report on medical aspects of Appalachian mixed ancestry by Nancy Morrison and Dr. Dorval Donohoe. The conferees were very interested in Nancy’s experience with hereditary illness that points to non-European ancestry, and Dr. Donohoe’s comments on the inadequate response of the medical profession to certain little-known diseases. When a panel that had been scheduled to discuss Appalachian diversity in the southern coal fields failed to materialize due to scheduling conflicts, illness, and an attorney held up in court, Rick Abraham spoke in its place on his experience of growing up in Logan County as a Syrian descendant surrounded by immigrants from all over southern Europe as well as earlier white and black inhabitants of the area who came to the coal fields seeking a better life.  He also gave the audience a brief overview of the conflicts and concerns held by many of those same families today as it relates to the regions’ continuing coal industry and the national debate.  The final afternoon lecture was a slide presentation on the Winton Triangle by Marvin T. Jones.  As a professional photographer, Jones has collected and restored several thousand images from Hertford County, North Carolina, where he was born to a family with hundreds of years of history in a mixed-ancestry community in the central portion of the county.  All the standard generalizations about mixed groups in the South are belied by the people of the Winton Triangle.  Instead of being relegated to marginal lands, they were the earliest landowners to arrive in the 1740s and held land that was very productive, and among the best acreage in the county.  Despite their nonwhite legal status, the community survived and thrived with its own businesses, educational institutions, and even a beach resort.  Marvin’s presentation was so fascinating that many conferees advised us that they wanted him invited to return next year to present at the 14th Union.  Friday afternoon concluded with a showing of Julie Williams Dixon’s acclaimed documentary Melungeon Voices.   Just as the National Genealogical Society audience in Raleigh, NC had received the film with rapt attention, those at the Union who had not been exposed to the documentary were impressed by the quality of the film.  Responding to comments made earlier in the day by Dr. Irene Wright to “be a witness regarding the Melungeons and other mixed ethinic groups” Ms. Dixon informed the audience of some of the venues the film has been used in over the past year which include it being part of a Diversity conference targeted to social workers held in Dalton, GA.  The film was also one of only four documentaries chosen for screening at the Appalachian Film Festival in Huntington, WV in the Spring of 2009.  There are also plans for the film to be used at a seminar being planned by a chapter of the DAR in Virginia. You can read about the film, check for screenings in your area,  and see a preview of the film at melungeonvoices.com.  After the film, conferees went to a reception at the Logan Area Public Library, where we enjoyed the hospitality of the library board president JoAnn Farmer, who is the sister of MHA president S.J. Arthur.

Saturday’s program opened with an informative and provocative presentation on the Tuscarora Project by University of Memphis historian Dr. Arwin D. Smallwood.  I had suggested both Marvin Jones and Dr. Smallwood because the Melungeon audience had been so receptive to my program on northeastern North Carolina at the 2008 Union; the MHA Board enthusiastically affirmed this when we met to begin planning 13th Union.  Both of them were tremendously well received, and some said they could listen to Arwin for three hours.  He began with a thorough explanation of the Tuscarora tribe’s contact with Europeans and Africans that preceded arrival of the British in 1685.  This was succeeded by a survey of the history of the tribe through the Tuscarora War of 1711-13.  The heart of Smallwood’s presentation was the fate of the Tuscarora, already a triracial people, as they were dispersed in many directions during the rest of the 18th century.  He left us with some suggestions about how, why, and where the Tuscarora may have contributed to the Melungeon mixture.  In hopes of hearing more along these lines, the MHA board is inviting Arwin to return next year and continue reporting on his Tuscarora Project.    The second presentation of the morning was the most I had most eagerly awaited, as it explained possible relationships between Melungeons and Gypsies of English and Irish origin.  Caitlin Graham has just completed a bachelor’s degree in history with an anthropology minor at the University of South Carolina, and her senior honors thesis was of special interest to the MHA audience.  She traced the history of Gypsy persecution in the British Isles, which led to their being transported to the colonies as undesirables.  Some cultural traits of Melungeons are similar to those of Gypsies, whose history of migration from India to Europe might explain certain DNA results such as those reported by Beth Hirschman.  As with so many earlier speakers, the audience was left wanting to know more about the Gypsy/Melungeon connection and hoping that Caitlin will return as a presenter at future unions.  The Saturday morning’s session concluded with a presentation that matched the high quality of many preceding it.  I was proud that Frank Sweet of Backintyme Publications is my publisher, when I heard his detailed explanation of the history of human migration which was crystal clear, flawlessly delivered, and fascinating even to those of us with no background in genetic anthropology.  He traced the human emergence from Africa and dispersal around the world over a period of more than a hundred thousand years, making the findings of a science that is all too little understood easily accessible by laymen.  His presentation was enhanced by many maps showing how humans adapted as we migrated around the world, which many in the audience found very helpful.  Frank has presented on several other topics at previous Unions, and always demonstrates a mastery of detail along with an ability to explain science and history to audiences new to his subject matter.

The final Saturday afternoon session provided both new information as well as reflections to help conferees make sense of all that had gone before.  Gregory Carroll of the West Virginia State Archives opened with an explanation of how Native Americans are very rarely recorded as such in state records, where the “mulatto” designation is far more frequently found.  For a variety of reasons similar to those faced by Indians in North Carolina and Virginia, Native Americans in the Mountain State were highly motivated to conceal their heritage in census and other records.  As a professional archivist, Carroll was very well prepared to handle the questions about genealogical research inspired by his illuminating presentation.  Portuguese presence in the New World was the topic of MHA board member Manuel Mira, who tied together many previous references to Mediterranean presence in the New World with personal reflections on his experiences as a researcher.  Among his many anecdotes, the one which stood out for me was his experience in northeastern North Carolina tracing clues to a local mixed-ancestry group called “Portuguese.”  Sometimes research into multiethnic groups can arouse suspicion and distrust, but Mira’s intrepid search for Portuguese traces in America was undeterred by these occupational hazards.  Although many of the Union speakers are deservedly admired, appreciated, and respected for their contributions, there is one who is absolutely loved by all who meet her.  Johnnie Gibson Rhea shared her personal stories of growing up on Newman’s Ridge, and anyone who has heard her knows what a master storyteller she is.  In addition to authoring three books on her family heritage, Johnnie expresses her creativity through handicrafts.   She concluded her presentation with the moment of the Union that was the greatest fun: giving out many prizes of her own making to audience members whose names were drawn from a hat.  By the end of her talk, most of us had acquired a crocheted hat or headband, handmade beads, or a variety of other handmade items.  If Dr. Smallwood’s presentation was the intellectual high point of the Union, Johnnie’s was the emotional homecoming that made us all feel a sense of belonging.  In his concluding address, clinical psychologist Dr. Elmer Maggard explored the lessons that can be learned from the experience of Melungeons.   He talked about the psychological effects of a legacy of oppression, which can be found in many mixed ancestry groups.  The immediate reaction is flight, and the migrations of Melungeons and related groups show that this option was often the one chosen.  Fighting back is also an option, as demonstrated by the Lumbees in the post-Civil War era with the Lowrie gang or their later triumph over the Klan.  All too often the reaction is to deny one’s identity and pretend to be something else—a form of cultural amnesia.  Sometimes oppressed groups are martyred, or go underground to fight.  But the option recommended by Dr. Maggard is the formation of community, in which healing of the damage wrought by oppression can be found in mutual support and assistance through sharing experiences and life stories.  In ending on such a positive note, Elmer suggested the fundamental objective of MHA as one of healing.

The Unions closed with an MHA annual meeting in which president S. J. Arthur thanked all the presenters, conferees, and Chief Logan staff for a nearly flawless event and sought input from the audience as to the areas they most enjoyed as well as where we could improve next year’s gathering.  Those of us staying over Sunday night were treated to a visit to Chief Logan State Park where curator Elizabeth Williams opened the museum for us after hours.  This allowed us to get to know our host state and region more immediately, through the many informative and moving exhibits in the museum as well as the beauty of the rugged countryside.

 

MHA is already making plans for 14th Union and will be incorporating the input of attendees as we go forth.  The Board will be meeting no later than the fall of this year.  MHA president, S. J. Arthur, did ask attendees (and is asking, via this blog, those who did not get to attend 13th Union) to send suggestions for 14th Union to her at sujear@yahoo.com.  She will share those with the Board and planning committee.

K. Paul Johnson                                                                                                                   

A.D. Powell presentation, 2004

Published by:

Powell: 6/18/04

White Racial Identity, Racial Mixture, and the “One Drop Rule”

by A. D. Powell
Presented at Fifth Union, Kingsport, Tennessee
Friday, 18 June 2004

In the days of the Third Reich, the Nazis imposed the “Nuremberg Laws” on German citizens. Assimilated German Jews were told that they were not German. It didn’t matter that their language, culture and self-image were all proudly German. They now belonged to a separate and “inferior race.” Nazi propaganda pictured all Jews as racially distinct from Germans, but the reality was that Jews were forced to wear symbols of identification – yellow Stars of David – so they would not be able to “pass” as German or “Aryan.” People with either one Jewish parent or grandparent found themselves reclassified as mischlings or “mixed race.” The biographies of German Jews and part-Jews frequently speak of “passing for Aryan” and the desirability of having Nordic as opposed to darker or more Semitic looks because the former facilitated the ability to “pass.” Are we having a feeling of deja vu yet?

A. D. Powell

While most Americans have been carefully taught that the Nazis were crazy, evil, racist, etc., for “seeing” separate “races” in Europe when they didn’t exist, we are never asked to see the similarity between the Nuremberg Laws that defined Jews and mischlings and our own legal and social traditions of racial classification – especially the myth that white people with a “taint” of Jewish – excuse me – Negro blood are not truly white but secret, “light-skinned” members of the “black race” who are only “passing for white.” Just as German Jews were declared unworthy of the honor of being German, American laws, films, novels, television programs, etc., encourage Americans to accept the idea that even small amounts of “black blood” destroy all right to a European-American heritage and identity. The great difference is that, while the Nazis were avowed racists, today’s American society is based on laws that enforce legal and social equality between the so-called “races.” Indeed, the idea that otherwise white persons can be secret, hidden members of the black race, is promoted by many of the very people who pride themselves on fighting racism in others.

Documentary Genocide and “Lynching” Reputations

In its June 16, 1996 issue, the very liberal and prestigious The New Yorker magazine published an article by Harvard University Afro-American Studies professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr., in which he denounced the late, highly respected New York Timesbook critic and author, Anatole Broyard, as a “light-skinned black man” who had “passed for white.” Entitled, “White Like Me: The True Lies of Anatole Broyard,” Gates’ article charged Broyard, who was of Louisiana Creole parentage, with “lying” about his “race” because he did not identify with blacks. The attack by Gates and The New Yorker was aimed not just at one man but at all Americans in a similar situation. It was an attack that Adolf Hitler and Walter Plecker would have enthusiastically supported.

Broyard had brought the blood of the “inferior” Negro race into the “superior” white race and “polluted” the latter. But wait! Our mainstream American media don’t believe in superior and inferior races. In our society, the ideals of racial equality and opposition to racism are trumpeted from the rooftops. What’s going on here?


A recent major motion picture, The Human Stain (and the novel that preceded it), also solemnly warned the nation that strange, inferior creatures it called “light-skinned blacks” had implanted themselves into the white race. Like the German Jews who looked German, acted German, etc., but were NOT truly German, these strange creatures looked and acted white but were most unworthy of that honor. It sounds almost like one of those horror movies in which aliens take over human bodies in an attempt to walk among us do us harm. Miramax, the company that produced the film, sent special instructions to movie critics to make sure that all of them knew about so-called “passing for white” and would describe the otherwise white protagonist, called “Coleman Silk,” as a “light-skinned black man” who was guilty of the heinous crime of claiming the “honor” of being white when he was tainted by the blood of the inferior black race – excuse me, we don’t believe in that anymore. He tainted the white race with the blood of the blacks in whose equality Miramax and all the other mainstream movie critics claim to believe. Does this make sense? If a man tells you he’s Irish and you later find out that he’s also part-German, do you denounce him as a lying German who only “passed” for Irish? No, because Irish and Germans are considered biological and social equals. If our Irishman is part-German, you are not getting an inferior product. If our Irishman is part-Negro, he is no longer Irish because the Negro blood means you are getting an “inferior” person and not the “superior” person you thought he was. This makes sense if you’re a racist who believes in white racial purity, but all these anti-passing accusations are made by people who claim to be against racism. Why is that?

The Human Stain was only the latest in a string of warnings about the white race being infiltrated by these alien, genetic freaks called “light-skinned blacks.” While those Americans who lived through the pre-Civil Rights era when racism (not anti-racism) was politically correct are aware of the so-called “anti-miscegenation” laws that supposedly prevented Negro blood from entering the white race, most Americans probably learn this lesson from Hollywood. Constant television reruns of films such as the two versions of Imitation of Life, Pinky and various television programs present the horror movie scenario- the inferior, genetic freaks look like us but are not us.

American journalists who write about so-called “passing for white” solemnly inform the public that “one drop” of “black blood” makes you “black” in the United States of America. They admit that this idea is rooted in the presumed inferiority of the race in whose equality they claim to believe. However, unlike other racist practices from the pre-Civil Rights era, we are told that the “one drop rule” is something we should embrace rather than scorn. We are told that those who reject the racism of the “one drop rule” are worthy of our contempt. Why the contradiction? Why is the “one drop” myth the only racist rule that self-described anti-racists in the media and academia are fighting to preserve? Why did the only credible and powerful opposition to the proposed “multiracial option” for the U.S. Census, for example, come from NAACP, the National Council of La Raza and other so-called civil rights organizations? Why are certain questions and matter of fact never presented to the public when the topic of so-called “passing for white” comes up? Consider the following:

* Hispanics and Arabs within the U.S. population show obvious signs of the supposedly dreaded “black blood.” Puerto Rico, Cuba and the Dominican Republic are essentially mulatto nations. Nearly all Mexicans have some black ancestry from the African slaves who were brought to colonial Mexico and then assimilated into the Indian and mestizo populations. Why is there an “escape hatch” for Hispanics and Arabs when their Anglo and Creole counterparts are condemned as “light-skinned blacks”? Whites who are told by family members to consider themselves “black” are told that “society” or “whites” in general hate and despise the dreaded “black blood.” But what racist worth his salt says that the “inferior” Negro blood is more than welcome into the white race as long as it comes speaking Spanish or Arabic?

* Since it is acknowledged that the “one drop rule” is racist, why are we told to preserve it instead of eliminating it? Why aren’t the people accused of “passing for white” hailed as heroes who defied racism instead of being subjected to character assassination and the kind of condemnation usually reserved for child molesters and serial killers?

* Why are black American elites and black-identified mulattoes usually the most fanatical and enthusiastic supporters of the “one drop rule”? Indeed, could this racist myth even continue to exist in polite society if blacks turned against it?

* Why is evidence against the “one drop rule” ignored? Why is the public never told that the antebellum Southern states legally permitted persons with one-fourth to one-eighth “Negro blood” into the white race, and could be even more lenient when the person or family was accepted by the local white community? Why are we not told that the “one drop rule” is not related to slavery but accompanied the rise of Jim Crow segregation and the eugenics movement? Why is the audience not told that no American is legally obligated to call himself “black” and the “one drop rule” depends almost totally on self-policing? Why are they lying to us?

While the Jews of Europe were punished with physical genocide for supposedly “polluting the “pure blood” of the “Aryan race,” Anglo and Creole Americans of partial black ancestry are subjected to documentary genocide and the lynching of reputations. People are declared “black” because some paper or ancestral document has the telltale words “black,” “Negro,” “Colored,” or “mulatto.” Or, like Anatole Broyard, their reputations are blackened after they are dead and can’t defend themselves.

The web sites Interracial Voice and The Multiracial Activist have spent several years challenging the idea of hypodescent. This is the doctrine that the offspring of mixed race unions should always identify with the ancestral group with the lowest social status and never with the higher status ancestry. In those years we have learned many things about “race” in the United States.


American Indian Ancestry and White Racial Identity

All white supremacists hold that white racial purity is essential for the survival of the white race. The support of so-called anti-racists for the “one drop rule” complements this idea perfectly. If a drop of black blood can truly make a white person black, who can blame whites who are opposed to interracial marriage? Bigotry becomes self-defense. Yet, even here there are contradictions. American Indian blood is considered harmless and compatible with white ancestry in a way that black blood is not. We started to ask why an American can say, “My grandmother is an Indian but I am white,” when he cannot say “My grandmother is black but I am white” without his right to a white identity being challenged.

All our lives we have seen people such as the late Johnny Cash, Burt Reynolds, Loretta Lynn, Cher, etc., proudly proclaim their American Indian ancestry without this acknowledgment being taken as a repudiation of their white ancestry or right to a white identity. One of Johnny Cash’s records, called Bitter Tears, is devoted to denouncing the wrongs done to American Indians by that favorite villain of politically correct American history, “The White Man.” But somehow Johnny’s whiteness was not compromised by this. According to the letter of Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act of 1924, most part-Indian whites would not be white, yet few Americans realize this. Why can’t “black blood” be treated like American Indian blood? Why are Interracial Voiceand The Multiracial Activist the only ones asking that question?

Have you noticed that, while Bell Curve-type studies purporting to show the genetic inferiority of blacks appear with some regularity, no one produces studies purporting to show that American Indians are racially inferior to whites? Could this be because the wide acknowledgment of American Indian ancestry in whites protects American Indians from this kind of racial attack? There is no political profit in it. In the two version of the American movie, The Squawman, the American Indian wife of a British aristocrat is clearly presented as racially inferior, but their son is not. The son is even considered a worthy heir to his father’s title and estates in England. Change the wife’s race to “black” and try to imagine that ending.


White Honor, Dishonor, and the Severing of Interracial Family Ties

Sociologist Orlando Patterson, in his cross-cultural study of slavery, Slavery and Social Death, describes a slave as a person with no ancestors. Biologically, of course, everyone has ancestors. But the slave has no official family and no family rights and obligations within society. He is socially dead. In American history, describing a physically white person as nonwhite, especially Negro or black, was a perfect way for white elites to send a message to the white masses: Don’t get too close to or friendly with blacks or mulattoes. Otherwise, you will lose your race, your honor, your whiteness, your very ancestry. You will become socially dead to other whites.

The producers of the 1934 version of Imitation of Life worried about how they were going to present the “passing for white” girl without evoking the specter of miscegenation. Clearly, some “pure white” had to mate with a Negro for the girl to exist. How could they avoid reminding the audience of that? It is no accident that, in Pinky, Imitation of Life, The Human Stain and other anti-passing melodramas, you almost never see any parents or ancestors who look like the accused passer. We are told that the absent father of the “passing” girl of Imitation of Life fame was a “real light-skinned colored man” since her docile black mammy would never be so bold and uppity as to mate with a real white man. The point is that we are meant to see the girl as a genetic freak. Whites did not produce her, we are told, and therefore have no family responsibility to her. We are also told that her spiritual descendant, Anatole Broyard, had no white ancestors since there were no “pure” whites among his immediate ancestors. The same could be said for most Latinos, but somehow their lack of white racial purity doesn’t count.

What is a family? What is an ethnic group? What are the obligations of a family? The “one drop rule” and the anti-passing drama tell us that the “passer” has sacred obligations to his socially inferior black-identified relatives which should prevent his upward mobility, but his “pure” white relatives have no obligation to him. Officially, he doesn’t have any white relatives or ancestors. The very term “light-skinned,” which has been used to describe anyone from brown-skinned people to Nordic blonds, is used as a euphemism to avoid saying “white.” We are taught that the “passer” is “light-skinned” but not “white.” Why? Because the word “white” implies a connection to and family relationships with white people – something anti-miscegenation laws and racial classification statutes were designed to destroy.

As previously mentioned, black elites and black-identified mulattoes have internalized many of these racist beliefs that “whites” and “blacks” can never be part of the same family. Yet, the Southern mulatto elite, which traditionally considered themselves the “superior” members of the “inferior” race, have families that are very racially mixed. The “one drop rule” or myth allows them the emotional luxury of hating whites in general while prizing the physical characteristics that white ancestry bestows. Most of the anti-passing hysteria in the post Civil Rights era seems to come from this group. Their fanatical devotion to the “one drop rule” is also used as a moral shield by others who want to promote the “one drop” or hypodescent ideology that proclaimed blacks and mulattoes inferior in the first place.


Hating Whites and Loving White Genes: Black Support of the “One Drop Myth” and White Racial Purity

In 1999 The Washington Post published an emotional article by one of its so-called “black” reporters, Lonnae O’Neal Parker, in which the author described her trauma when she discovered that her first cousin, Kim, was white-identified. This shouldn’t have been too surprising since Kim was born to and reared by a “pure” white mother, looks totally white, and has a “light-skinned” mulatto father who was not keen to identify with blacks.

O’Neal Parker’s article became a nationwide sensation. The Seattle Times and other papers reprinted it and ABC Television’sNightline devoted an entire episode to it. O’Neal parker’s highly irrational thesis was that Cousin Kim and all others in a similar situation have an obligation to repudiate their white ancestry and identify with blacks in order to make up for any wrongs done to blacks and black-identified mulattoes by whites in both the present and the distant past. In other words, the “one drop rule” is not presented to the public as a sign of black moral superiority instead of black biological inferiority. Cousin Kim supposedly chose the evil, racist whites over the innocent, pure-hearted blacks. This is also the way the “one drop” myth was justified inThe Human Stain and the attacks on Anatole Broyard. O’Neal Parker, who is herself mulatto elite – not physically black but not as white as Kim – has no problem incorporating white genes into her family, but she does not want whites in it since whites are defined as the enemy. Only in Interracial Voice and The Multiracial Activist could one find some suggestion that O’Neal Parker’s racial views were – shall we say – not a picture of good mental health.

We find it very interesting that O’Neal Parker insists that Cousin Kim must refuse to be white because “whites” are the enemies of blacks. It was the white-owned Washington Post and other white media that promoted O-Neal Parker’s venom and let it go unchallenged. They were the ones who gave her a forum. In The New York Times, black columnist Brent Staples performs a similar task ; his columns are used mainly to promote the “one drop rule” and denounce “passing for white.” The “one drop” myth is promoted either through blacks or justified as a glorification of blacks.


Racial Kidnaping and Ethnic Rape

What do we mean by a glorification of blacks? At Interracial Voice we started using the terms racial kidnaping and ethnic rape to refer to the practice of claiming as “black” people who were not physically black and did not identify with blacks. Kidnaping and rape are appropriate analogies here because the victims are taken by force – clearly against their will. Anatole Broyard was such a victim. Here are some other major examples:

Michael Morris Healy, an Irish immigrant, arrived in the U.S. around 1815 and established a plantation near Macon, Georgia. He took a mulatto slave, Eliza Clark, as his common-law wife and the two produced 10 children. All of the surviving children were sent North to be educated and protected from slavery since Georgia made legal manumission almost impossible. They were baptized as Catholics and lived the rest of their lives as proud Irish Americans. James Augustine Healy became Bishop of Portland, Maine. Patrick Francis Healy became President of Georgetown University from 1873 to 1881. Michael Morris Healy, Jr. joined the U.S. Revenue Cutter Service (the forerunner of the U.S. Coast Guard) and became a celebrated sea captain, the sole representative of the U.S. Government in Alaska. Now, many decades after their deaths, these proud (and “white”) Irish Americans are being widely promoted as “blacks.” First “blacks” this and first “blacks” that, even though no one identified with blacks could have accomplished what they did. The U.S. Government named an ice cutter after Captain Healy, but only to honor blacks, not him. Indeed, for Captain Healy it is an insult rather than an “honor.”

What is the point of this racial or ethnic kidnaping? Does it prove what blacks could accomplish? No! The Healys were biologically more white than black and, socially, they were white. What can the public conclude except that something is strangely unique, mystical and inferior about black genes? (See http://www.interracialvoice.com/powell8.html)

On November 30, 1944 Calvin Clark Davis of Bear Lake, Michigan died a hero’s death in World War II as part of the U.S. Army Air Force. He was posthumously honored with several medals. However, the “honor” was tainted by the fact that Davis was described as a “black man” who “pretended to be white.” Indeed, Davis’ racial identity has received far more publicity than his military heroics. I wrote an article about Davis for Interracial Voice called “Pissing on the Grave of Heroes.” Davis, we are told:

* passed for white
* lied about who he was
* concealed his race
* faked being white

Remember what I said about having no ancestors? Far from being honored for his military service, Davis is being publicly shamed and dishonored.

Another World War II hero “outed” for alleged “passing for white” was Pvt. Robert Brooks of Sadieville, Kentucky. He died heroically in the Philippines on December 8, 1941. His story appears in Studs Terkel’s book on World War II, The Good War.

Here are other prominent examples of racial kidnaping or ethnic rape:

* Jean Toomer, whose name is taught to schoolchildren and college students as the “black” author of a book of poetry and short stories called Cane, was in fact a multiracial Caucasian who rejected a false “black” identity and wrote extensively on why the U.S. racial classification system should be eliminated in favor of a common “American” identity.

* Alexander Dumas, the French author of the famed novel The Three Musketeers, is presented to American schoolchildren as “black” when he was really three-quarters white and in no way socially “black.”

* Alexander Pushkin, the greatest of Russian poets and father of Russian literature, is frequently presented to schoolchildren as another famous “black” because of one African great-grandfather.

Why are all of these people described as “black” in American schools even though there are no physical or cultural standards to justify that description? Are they claimed as “black” because of a tacit fear that “black” genes cannot stand on their own? Is this a “liberal” version of the old racist canard that miscegenation “improves” the “Negro” race while “degrading” the white race?


The Lies that Sustain the Myth of “Passing for White”

When the “one drop myth” is reported in the mainstream media, no mention whatsoever is made of the evidence against it. Such evidence, if presented, never sees the light of day and is limited to a few people who take pains to study the subject. The American people are not allowed to consider the following:

* If the “one drop rule” is real and enforced by whites, why is a glaring exception made for Hispanics and Arab-Americans? It does not take a genius to see both the physical and historical evidence that Hispanics and Arabs are nearly all “tainted” with the blood of what used to be America’s official “inferior race.”

* Why aren’t Americans told that antebellum definitions of “white” tended to be more liberal than 20th century definitions; people with one-fourth to one-eighth Negro blood were legally allowed into the white race. For example, Edison Hemings Jefferson, the former slave son of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings (and whose white descendants are the only Hemings descendants to pass a DNA test showing descent from the Jefferson line), was legally white once he was manumitted because the has at least seven-eights white. We should not be surprised that in both abolitionist and Republican Party literature, “white slaves” were frequently used to arouse the Northern white population against slavery. Why are these facts kept from the American people?

* What are the real world standards for saying that someone is “black” and not “white”? Edison Hemings Jefferson is always described in the media as “light-skinned black” who only “passed for white,” but his descendants are acknowledged as white without qualification. Where is the cutoff point? The only one I can see is that dead whites with a touch of the dreaded “tarbush” are “black” and those still living are ‘white.”

In the magazine American Heritage, a white woman named Jillian Sim announced that she had discovered that her great-grandmother was Anita Hemmings, a white mulatto or mixed white who graduated from Vassar College in the late 19th century was almost expelled for being “colored” when a wealthy and envious classmate decided to have her background investigated. Now Vassar proudly claims that Anita, who lived as white for the rest of her life, was their first “black” graduate. Jillian Sim accepts the myth that Anita was a “black” who “passed for white” and she condemns both her paternal grandmother and great-grandparents as “blacks” who “passed for white.” Sim, her father, and her son, however, are still white. The dead are “black” and the living are “white.”

After Broadway star Carol Channing’s recent disclosure that her father was partially black but lived all his life as a white man, you’ll notice that Channing is not described as “black” in the media but her father is described that way without qualification. Moreover, if you look at the Amazon.com comments on Channing’s autobiography, Just Lucky, I Guess, you’ll note that commentators who are black-identified insist on calling her “black” as well.

People as diverse as the actress Mae West, former U.S. President Dwight David Eisenhower and former Georgia Congressman Bob Barr, etc. have been labeled “black” (usually by blacks and black-identified mulattoes) on the basis of the one-drop myth. There appear to be no standards except opportunism – the ethnic rape charge again.

It is common, we at Interracial Voice have discovered, for black-identified supporters of the “one drop” myth to announce that people don’t “look white” when they’ve been white all or nearly all of their lives. They will shamelessly insist that Carol Channing doesn’t look white and Mae West didn’t look white. They could see the dreaded colored blood all along! Mixed whites who used to travel all over the Jim Crow South as white, are told by fanatical black-identified folks that they are obviously black. These rants are so similar, we swear there must be a school somewhere that teaches black-identified folks nothing but defense of the “one drop” myth.

“Passing for White” is an Honored American Tradition – for Nearly Everyone Else. “Passing” is an honored American custom – for nearly everyone except tarbrushed whites non-Hispanic, non-Arab whites and mulattoes who have the misfortune to be too American or Louisiana Creole. It is not so much your touch of the dreaded black blood that matters, but whether or not your ancestral documents (census records, birth, marriage and death certificates, etc.) bear the telltale words “mulatto” or “free person of color” or “Negro” on them.

The Latino Escape Hatch. Throughout most of the 20th century, Latino elites in the United States (and the government of Mexico itself) argued that all Hispanics should be classified as “white” on all official records – regardless of appearance or ancestry. So a blond person with the “tarbrush” could be labeled “Negro” in Texas while a dark-skinned Mexican with no white blood or European ancestry would be officially labeled “white” – even if he was treated more like a Negro than a white person. Now that is big time passing!

South Asians. Before the Civil Rights era and the rise of affirmative action, South Asians from India, Pakistan, etc. insisted that they were “white.” They were first labeled “nonwhite” and then received the ultimate honor of being called “white.” According to this myth, dark-skinned people from India were dark-skinned “Caucasians” while “tarbrushed” Americans of totally European phenotype were unworthy to call themselves “Caucasian.” Now South Asians are called “Asians” and are eligible for “minority” benefits and the numerous advantages “white guilt” can bestow. Big time passing!

Mississippi Chinese. The Chinese of Mississippi started out as “colored” and many of the men married “Negro” women. The leaders of the Chinese community begged the local white elites for the right to be classified as “white” instead of “colored.” The price the white elites imposed was rejection of all Chinese kin who were part-Negro or intermarried with Negroes. Big time passing and a rejection of family that you will never see condemned on television a la Imitation of Life.

Jew and “Passing for White.” The Jewish immigrant moguls who founded Hollywood prided themselves on rejecting their Jewish heritage and forced Jewish actors and actresses to change their names. That is why Jews named Issur Danielovich, Bernie Schwartz and Betty Persky became Kirk Douglas, Tony Curtis and Lauren Bacall, respectively. You can buy books telling you about hundreds of famous Americans who are secretly Jewish. By “secretly” I don’t mean that they would deny it if you asked them. I mean that they don’t announce it and carefully present a non-Jewish image to the public. This is called passing when the tarbrushed whites do it. It is big time passing!

Working Class “Passing.” Hiding a working class background when one rises in class is considered morally acceptable. In an anthology of autobiographical essays from academics from the working class, This Fine Place So Far From Home: Voices of Academics from the Working Class (Temple University Press, 1995), editors C.L. Barney Dews and Carolyn Leste Law present a stream of stories in which academics from poor and working class backgrounds quickly learn to “pass” as upper middle class in origin and hide their less desirable relatives and backgrounds. In the 1930’s movie, Stella Dallas, the working class mother drives her daughter away so the girl can be reared by her upper class father and have a better life. The film ends with the mother secretly looking at her daughter’s high society wedding while standing outside in the rain. Imagine Imitation of Life ending like that! Big time passing!

Southern Whites in the North and “Passing for Yankee.” One can also say that Southern whites who move North quickly learn to drop the accent and “pass” for Yankee. I once asked Rick Bragg, the former New York Times reporter and author, who is from Alabama, how he managed at The Times when he is so obviously Southern. He admitted that he is an exception. Many others will not deny that they were born south of the Mason-Dixon line, but hope to God that no one brings it up. Think of it! How many white Southerners do you know who are not poor and living in a community with other Southerners who retain their accents or advertise their Southern origins? Big time passing!

Finally, how can there be true equality in this country while the “one drop” myth is presented to the American people as a perverted ideal we must honor – for no reason that makes any sense? I began this presentation with a reference to racial definition laws of Nazi Germany. There is no sense in pointing out the illogic and racism of the Nuremberg Laws while simultaneously upholding the “one drop” myth and its assumptions of white racial purity.

We at Interracial Voice and The Multiracial Activist have spent years arguing with people (the vast majority of them black-identified) who claim to be devoted opponents of racism but fight like hell to retain the myth that all true whites are “pure” and “one drop” of “black blood” makes you “black.” But what we call “race” is a spectrum of human colors and phenotypes that blend into each other. There are no hard and fast boundaries that divide one so-called “race” from another. Whenever we fail to challenge the “one drop” myth and argue in favor of human freedom to choose one’s one own identity, we effectively deny that sacred reality.


Selected Bibliography

Barney Dews, C.L. & Law, Carolyn Leste. This Fine Place So Far from Home: Voices of Academics from the Working Class. Temple University Press, 1995.

Brodkin, Karen. How Jews Became White Folks and What That Says About Race in America. Rutgers University Press, 1999.

Brooks, James F. Confounding the Color Line: The Indian-Black Experience in North America. University of Nebraska Press, 2002.

Channing, Carol. Just Lucky I Guess: A Memoir of Sorts. Simon & Schuster, 2002.

Clinton, Catherine & Gillespie, Michelle, Eds. The Devil’s Lane: Sex and Race in the Early South. Oxford University Press, 1997.

Courtney, Susan. “Picturizing Race: Hollywood’s Censorship of Miscegenation and Production of Racial Visibility through Imitation of Life.” Genders 27 1998

Crane, Cynthia. Divided Lives: The Untold Stories of Jewish-Christian Women in Nazi Germany. Palgrave MacMillan, 2000.

Dominguez, Virginia. White by Definition: Social Classification in Creole Louisiana. Rutgers University Press. 1994

Dorman, James H. Creoles of Color of the Gulf South. University of Tennessee Press, 1996.

Foley, Neil. “Becoming Hispanic: Mexican Americans and the Faustian Pact with Whiteness,” in Reflexiones 1997: New Directions in Mexican American Studies, ed. Neil Foley (Austin: University of Texas-Center for Mexican American Studies, 1997

Forbes, Jack D. Africans and Native Americans: The Language of Race and the Evolution of Red-Black Peoples. University of Illinois Press, 1993.

Gabler, Neal. An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood. Random House Value Pub., 1988.

Gallay, Alan. The Indian Slave Trade: The Rise of the English Empire in the American South, 1670-1717. Yale University Press, 2003.

Gates, Henry L. Jr., “White Like Me,” The New Yorker (June 17, 1996)

Gugielmo, Jennifer and Salerno, Salvatore. Are Italians White?: How Race is Made in America. Routledge, 2003.

Haney Lopez, Ian F. White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race (Critical America Series), New York University Press, 1998.

Hartigan, John Jr. Racial Situations: Class Predicaments of Whiteness in Detroit. Princeton University Press, 1999.

Hodes, Martha E. Sex, Love, Race: Crossing Boundaries in North American History. New York University Press, 1999.

Hoberman, J. “Jump Cuts,” The Village Voice, October 29, 2004.

Jacobson, Matthew Frye. Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race. Harvard University Press, 1999.

Johnson, Kevin R. How Did You Get to Be Mexican?: A White/Brown Man’s Search for Identity. Temple University Press, 1999.

Johnson, Kevin R. (Ed.) Mixed Race America and the Law: A Reader. New York University Press, 2003.

Kein, Sybil. Creole: The History and Legacy of Louisiana’s Free People of Color. Louisiana State University Press, 2000.

Kerman, Cynthia Earl. The Lives of Jean Toomer: A Hunger for Wholeness. Louisiana State University Press, 1987.

Loewen, James W. The Mississippi Chinese: Between Black and White. Waveland Press, 1988.

Logan Alexander, Adele. Ambiguous Lives: Free Women of Color in Rural Georgia, 1789-1879. The University of Arkansas Press, 1991.

Mills, Gary B. The Forgotten People: Cane River’s Creoles of Color. Louisiana State University Press, 1977.

Mills, Gary B. “Miscegenation and the Free Negro in Antebellum ‘Anglo’ Alabama: A Reexamination of Southern Race Relations” The Journal of American History, Vol. 6, No. June 98. Pp. 6-34.

Mosse, George L. Toward the Final Solution: A History of European Racism. Howard Fertig, 1978.

O’Toole, James M. Passing for White: Race, Religion, and the Healy Family, 1820-1920. University of Massachusetts Press, 2003.

Pascoe, Peggy. “Miscegenation Law, Court Cases, and Ideologies of “Race” in Twentieth-Century America,” The Journal of American History, 83 (no. 1, June 1996), 44-69.

Patterson, Orlando. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Harvard University Press, 1985.

Rigg, Bryan Mark. Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers: The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Jewish Descent in the German Military. University Press of Kansas, 2002.

Root, Maria P., Ed. The Multiracial Experience : Racial Borders as the New Frontier. SAGE Publications, 1995.

Roth, Philip. The Human Stain: A Novel. Vintage, 2001.

Sim, Jillian. “Fading to White.” American Heritage. February/March 1999.

Sollors, Werner. Interracialism: Black-White Intermarriage in American History, Literature, and Law. Oxford University Press, 2000.

Sollors, Werner. Neither Black Nor White Yet Both: Thematic Explorations of Interracial Literature. Harvard University Press, 1999.

Suro, Roberto. Strangers Among Us: Latinos’ Lives in a Changing America. Vintage Books, 1999.

Sweet, Frank W. The De-Assimilation of South Carolina. Backintyme, 2000.

Sweet, Frank W. The Destruction of the Louisiana Creoles. Backintyme, 2000.

Sweet, Frank W. The Virginia Origin of the Two-Caste System. Backintyme, 2000.

Takaki, Ronald. Strangers from a Different Shore: A History of Asian Americans. Little Brown & Company, 1989.

Tent, James F. In the Shadow of the Holocaust: Nazi Persecution of Jewish-Christian Germans (Modern War Studies). University Press of Kansas, 2003.

Tenzer, Lawrence R. A Completely New Look at Interracial Sexuality: Public Opinion and Select Commentaries. Scholars Publishing House, 1991.

Tenzer, Lawrence R. The Forgotten Cause of the Civil War: A New Look at the Slavery Issue. Scholars Publishing House, 1997.

Terkel, Studs. The Good War: An Oral History of World War II. Random House, 1984.

Thomas, Piri. Down These Mean Streets. Vintage, 1997.

Watts, Jill. Mae West: An Icon in Black and White. Oxford University Press, 2003.

Zack, Naomi, Ed. American Mixed Race. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1995.


Internet Links

From Interracial Voice:

“White,”Mixed”‘or”Other?'”Some Books and Articles Your Librarian Didn’t Tell you About!
http://www.interracialvoice.com/powell.html

When Are Irish-Americans Not Good Enough to Be Irish-American? “Racial Kidnaping” and the Case of the Healy Family
http://www.interracialvoice.com/powell8.html

Racial Mixture, “White” Identity, and The “Forgotten” (or censored) Cause of the Civil War
http://www.interracialvoice.com/powell9.html

Are “White” Americans All “Passing as White”? The Alchemy of “Race”
http://www.interracialvoice.com/powell11.html

White Folks — A True Story
http://www.interracialvoice.com/powell6.html

Pissing on the Graves of Heroes
http://www.interracialvoice.com/powell14.html

Thoughts on Lonnae O’Neal Parker’s article “White Girl?”
http://www.webcom.com/intvoice/bethgray.html

“Imitation of Life” (1934), A Window on “Passing” or Who is “white”?
http://www.interracialvoice.com/gwinkel8.html

Latinos and their Escape Hatches

From The Multiracial Activist

White Slaves: Chapter 3 of The Forgotten Cause of the Civil War
http://www.multiracial.com/readers/tenzer3.html

From The Washington Post

Parker, Lonnae O’Neal. “White Girl? Cousin Kim Is Passing. But Cousin Lonnae Doesn’t Want to Let Her Go.” The Washington Post. 1999.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A43852-2000Feb28¬Found=true

Views: 6533

Joseph Scolnick presentation, 2004

Published by:

Scolnick: 6/17/04

From Anatolia To Appalachia

by Joseph Scolnick

Presented at Fifth Union
Kingsport, Tennessee
Thursday, 17 June 2004

In deciding which aspects of From Anatolia To Appalachia: A Turkish-American Dialogue to emphasize in this afternoon’s talk, Brent Kennedy and I decided that it would be useful both to lay out the possible evidence for the Ottoman/Turkish-Melungeon relationship as well as to discuss several issues that relate to “proof” of the validity of the relationship and so these are the two major topics of my talk. When they have been covered, a couple of brief remarks about other aspects of our book will serve as my conclusion

To start, why does today’s subject interest me? Because it is unlikely that I am a Melungeon, how did I become interested in Melungeon affairs in general and in the Ottoman/Turkish-Melungeon relationship in particular? Actually, it all began during a lunch with Brent Kennedy at a local restaurant in Wise in the fall of 1997. It was at this meal that I first heard about Melungeons and the possible Ottoman/Turkish- Melungeon connection. Every aspect of our conversation interested me, especially the part about the Mediterranean connection. Let me say a few words about this.


My main academic field is International Relations. When I first heard about the subject of Melungeons and their background, I was already interested in Southern Europe. I had become a naval officer (via NROTC) after receiving my B.A. degree in Foreign Affairs from the University of Virginia in 1961. For 8 ½ months in 1962, my ship, the U.S.S. Taconic (AGC-17), cruised the Mediterranean. During that voyage, we visited ports in Italy, Spain, France, and Greece. Those countries were fascinating and their attraction has never weakened.

During my introduction by Brent to the subject of the Melungeons, I realized that despite my having already earned three academic degrees and having taught at the college level for twenty-eight years, my knowledge of the Ottoman Empire and of modern Turkey was essentially nil. As a result of that initial conversation and what has followed it, I have been reading for the last five years plus about these subjects, especially modern Turkey.

What else? I have visited Turkey three times with Melungeon groups. Wonderful, exhausting, unforgettable trips! Far too much occurred during them for me to even begin to discuss it all here. What else? I presently offer a course in Southern European Governments And Politics (France, Italy, and Spain) and also one on Modern Turkey at the University of Virginia’s College at Wise. Moreover, I had a hand in my school becoming a sister institution of Istanbul and Dumlupinar Universities in Turkey; it is splendid having students from Istanbul University on our campus every year. And then there is the book with Brent that I’m going to discuss today and, hopefully, another we will collaborate on. “Inshallah” as the Turks say; if God wills it! So this gives you a little of my background as a speaker. Let me go directly now to my first major topic.


THE MELUNGEON and OTTOMAN/TURKISH-MELUNGEON HYPOTHESES

In my introduction to the Melungeons, I first heard about something called a “tri-racial isolate.” This was entirely new to me. Apparently, it was not only commonly believed but also enforced law in Virginia that all of the people of this region were Caucasian (Northern European), Black, Native American, or some combination of the three. Nothing else! And the results of this belief and law had horrendous effects on all of the people who did not claim to be and look Northern European. These laws were cruel, unfair, almost certainly inaccurate, and could not ultimately stand. But from what direction would a successful challenge to the belief and law come? One answer is the Melungeon hypothesis: that many of the people of this region have elements of their genetic backgrounds other than only those three just mentioned. One additional genetic element comes from the Mediterranean region; part of this is the Ottoman/Turkish connection.

As the Melungeon hypothesis was laid out for me, it had basically three parts. The first part is that the people of the Mediterranean were of greatly varied ancestry; “Spaniards”, “French”, “Turks” then were really mixtures of different groups. This was obviously true. Anyone who knows anything about the history of the Mediterranean region knows that these peoples have been mixing with each other since before recorded history. (The reasons for the mixture are too numerous to go into here.) So, for example, many, if not all of the “Spaniards” who sailed to the New World were almost certainly a very heterogeneous group. Among them, in all likelihood, would be people with ties to the Ottoman Empire; an enormous area covering, at different times, up to the gates of Vienna, Southern Russia, Anatolia (the heartland of modern Turkey), to the borders of Persia (Iran), the Arabian peninsula (including the Muslim holy sites of Mecca and Medina), the entire Middle East, and all of North Africa except Morocco. So, to be “Spanish” or “Portuguese” in that time period was to likely possess at least some Ottoman (i.e. Turkish) heritage.

The second part is that the Spanish, French, and Portuguese sent ships to the New World, including the southeastern part of the United States, and these ships contained people of mixed backgrounds including peoples of Ottoman/Turkish background. That the ships were sent is beyond dispute. That these ships contained people of mixed background is almost as certain. And it is highly likely, given the situation in the Mediterranean during these centuries, that people of Ottoman (and Anatolian) backgrounds were on them. Is it conceivable that all of the people on the Spanish ships were Spanish grandees? That boggles the mind. So the second part of the Melungeon hypothesis is also almost certainly correct.

By the way, I need to mention another possibility here and it is that Ottoman galleys could have sailed and landed in the New World. It is commonly thought that the types of ships used by the Ottomans would never have successfully attempted the journey; although fine for the Mediterranean Sea, they would never have successfully made it across the Atlantic Ocean. Yet it is recorded that Ottoman ships raided Europe from the Atlantic, some even attacking Britain. So why couldn’t Ottoman ships have made it to the Southereastern U.S. during the most favorable season of the year? We have no hard evidence for this but it was certainly feasible.

The third part of the Melungeon hypothesis is that some portion of the people on the Spanish, Portuguese, and French ships in one way or another landed in the Southeastern United States, were left there, made their way inland, were accepted by Native American tribes, and produced descendants who were in that region when the British later arrived and found them. There is nothing impossible or even implausible about this. If we know anything about humans, it is that some of them are incredibly tenacious and adaptable. They not only survive awe-inspiring hardships but even thrive in the most difficult environments. But what is the evidence that this actually occurred?

Here are some possibilities of how the ancestors of the Melungeons arrived in this region centuries ago. The list is not exhaustive.

1. There were substantial Spanish settlements in the Carolinas. One was Santa Elena in present day South Carolina. Many members of this settlement were stranded when the Spanish abandoned their settlements.

2. There were expeditions from the Southwestern into the South Atlantic regions of the United States centuries ago by the Spanish and Portuguese. Were any of these explorers left behind?

3. In 1586, Sir Francis Drake is believed to have left behind hundreds of Moors and Turks on Roanoke Island, North Carolina. Drake’s operations in the Caribbean against the Spanish were extensive. Many ships were involved. Spanish prisoners as well as others held by the Spanish were taken with Drake’s ships. Where did they all come ashore?

4. Karachai and Kavkas silk workers were brought over by the 16th century Spanish to the New World. They worked in Cuba, Mexico, Florida, and the American Southwest. They could have left descendants.

5. Turks and Armenians were among the indentured servants of the Jamestown colony in Virginia in the first quarter of the 17th century. Did they have descendants? Where did they live when they left the colony?

6. Queen Elizabeth I of England is believed to have made an agreement with the Ottoman Sultan and the King of Morocco to populate the New World in order to shut out her enemies, the Spanish and French. To what extent was the plan carried out?

Let me emphasize what I said a few minutes ago that this list is almost certainly incomplete as well as inaccurate. But the main point here is that there were a number of opportunities for people of Mediterranean origin to have been left behind in this region centuries ago. Nevertheless, what is the direct evidence that they existed, admixed with native people of the region, and left descendants, some of whom we call “Melungeon” today? The first two parts of the Melungeon hypothesis are surely accurate. It is the third part for which there is inadequate evidence. So if this is all that exists of evidence for the origins of the Melungeons , we can say that although the situation could well have occurred as just discussed, the evidence is insufficient to be sure about it. A great deal of research remains to be done on a number of aspects of the hypothesis about the origins of the Melungeons.


FURTHER EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE MELUNGEON HYPOTHESIS

There is a good deal more than I have discussed so far that indicates that the basic Melungeon hypothesis is essentially correct and that there is an Ottoman/Turkish component to many of these people. In fact, it is likely that the probable offspring of those left behind centuries ago live in this region today. Indeed, they are some of the folks at my college and neighbors. Let’s look at them for a bit and note some of their characteristics

Possible Evidence

1. DNA-Genetic Studies. In 1990, a reanalysis of an earlier study found genetic links of 177 Melungeons to the populations of Portugal, the Canary Islands, Italy, North Africa, Malta, Turkey, and Cyprus. Another test done in 2002 detected links between the Melungeons to Northern European, Black, and Native American populations as well to the people of Turkey and Northern India. And it seems that the genetic links are in both the paternal and maternal Melungeon lines indicating both male and female ancestors in the New World. But I really do not feel capable of discussing genetics at any length. Later today, Professor Kevin Jones of the University of Virginia’s College at Wise is scheduled to be a speaker. He is an expert on DNA and genetics and can probably answer most of your questions about this subject.

2. Diseases. It appears that Melungeons have certain diseases in numerical proportions that they should not have if they are truly tri-racial isolates. These diseases are far more common in the Mediterranean area than in Northern Europe; thalassemia, Tay-Sacks disease, sarcoidosis, Machado-Joseph disease, Behcet’s syndrome, and familial Mediterranean fever are the ones I am aware of. This is not definite “proof” but it is indicative of a Mediterranean connection.

3. Physical Markers. These are physical characteristics of Central ASIANS and Turks, often found in Melungeons, but not in most Northern Europeans. What are they? Here are several: a total lactose deficiency, Asian shovel teeth, a Central Asian cranial bump, six fingers on each hand (commonly removed at birth) – a trait of Turks of the Aegean region – and epicanthic folds on the eyelids. Again, not proof in itself but indicative of a connection.

4. Physical Phenotypes. On this topic, let me quote Professor Doctor Turan Yazgan, President of the Turkish World Research Foundation with its headquarters in Istanbul, Turkey. This is from page 87 of the book Brent and I wrote: “When I first looked at Brent Kennedy’s face, I was looking at my nephew. Physically, he is the twin brother of my nephew, Atakan Yazgan. While this is not DNA, physical phenotypes do tell us certain things about probable kinship.” Very interesting; physical phenotypes should not to be ignored.

5. Family Memories and Tales. When asked about their origins, Melungeons commonly mention “Portyghee”, “Jew”, and “Turk,” along with Native American, as some of their family origins. Naturally, the family memories could be incorrect for many reasons. For one thing, we know that people often lie about their backgrounds either to gain some advantage or to avoid some harm. For example, when speaking to British people in the 16th or 17th centuries, Spaniards might usefully claim to be Portuguese because Portugal was a British ally and Spain, an enemy. But why claim to be of Turkish origin? What is the possible gain? Thus, these family memories may be incorrect but are not likely to be the result of deliberate lies. And they ought to be taken seriously when found in conjunction with other facts.

6. Non-Verbal Movements. People of different areas and cultures tend to use different non-verbal head, facial, hand, and body gestures that show agreement, disagreement, impatience, pleasure, anger, confusion, uncertainty, and much more. These non-verbal movements also are often passed from one generation of a family or group to the next. Without attempting to show examples of this today, let me just state that there appears to be some commonality between a number of these non-verbal behaviors in Melungeons and Turks (e.g. The “clicking” of one’s tongue against the teeth to indicate “no.”). As with much else mentioned here, this is worthy of extensive further study.

7. Life Style – Social/Cultural Elements. I mean “culture” here in the broadest terms. I have been to Turkey three times with Melungeon groups. The Turks and Melungeons tend to easily and quickly take to each other; they seem very compatible. The reasons for this are complex and outside my expertise. But it seems a worthy enterprise to study common social and cultural attributes of both groups. What sorts of things would be looked at? Here are a few. We would study family organization and interpersonal expectations and behavior. We also would perhaps compare their foods, design patterns, stories/tales, superstitions, musical instruments, music, dances, and perhaps language itself as some of the comparisons to make. At any rate, the Turks and Melungeons I have observed interact with each other tend to find a lot in common and do this almost instantly. At the least, this apparent commonality of the two groups is very interesting although again not conclusive “proof.” So there is a great deal just waiting to be studied in this category.

Is all of what I’ve just discussed convincing “proof” of the Ottoman/Turkish-Melungeon relationship? No. Some of the similarities may be superficial and are not a sign of genuine common identity. But, and it is a big “but”, all of what I’ve just discussed is surely strongly suggestive that a connection exists. And there is more than enough to make it evident that the proposed Ottoman/Turkish-Melungeon relationship is worthy of extended, intensive study.


ESTABLISHING THE VALIDITY OF THE MELUNGEON HYPOTHESIS

Let me talk about “proof” in the Social Sciences for a few moments in layman terms. Let’s start by stating that nothing will ever show the validity of the Melungeon hypothesis with its Ottoman/Turkish- Melungeon component in such a way that it will be unanimously accepted and never questioned again. This is not mathematics. This is not mathemathical proof. I am discussing a subject that involves a variety of fields of study. Many aspects of it though not all involve the Social Sciences. A lot of the truly interesting and important questions in the Social Sciences will never have precise, totally convincing answers. That’s just the way things are. We almost never can say absolutely “yes” although sometimes we can say definitely “no” and that is the situation with the Melungeon hypothesis. So no standard of evidence, of proof, should be expected beyond what the nature of the subject permits.

In much Social Science research, what is meant by “proof”? Actually, it is examining all of the evidence presented for and against a particular hypothesis (statement) and then, as objectively as possible, attempting to determine whether the pros or the cons regarding a specific hypothesis appear to be stronger. In this regard, much Social Science research is done in terms of levels or degrees of “probability.” In other words, scholars look at all of the evidence and attempt to determine as well as possible how probable (likely) it is that something is correct. At times this can be done fairly precisely and with a good deal of confidence in the final decision. And, yes, sometimes the results are too murky to say almost anything definite. So I am talking here about determining as well as possible how likely it is that the Melungeon hypothesis is substantially correct. Right now, among other things, there is a need for further study in many fields in order to determine just what is and is not relevant evidence in support of the hypothesis. But even at this relatively early stage of the study of the subject, it appears that there is sufficient solid supportive evidence for people to make two tentative conclusions.

What are they? First, the evidence definitely suggests that the tri-racial isolate hypothesis is almost certainly incorrect. It is far too simple a view of the genetic and cultural makeup of the people of this region. That is clear although it may take a long time before this conclusion is widely accepted. The second tentative conclusion is that there is sufficient reason to vigorously push ahead with many areas of study related to the Melungeon hypothesis; there is more than enough evidence to make it worthy of serious study. But what will it take to encourage, financially support, and communicate this research? Now this is a separate subject in itself that I will not take up today.

In talking further about the issue of “proof”, let me touch briefly on three issues: written evidence, unanimity, and finality. First, what about written evidence? Is it necessary for valid scholarship? No, it is not. In some fields, there is little or no written/printed material to even consider. Moreover, written materials, among other things, may be incorrect, incomplete, accidentially false, and deliberately false. For one example, consider The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a 19th century Czarist Russian police fabrication, that claims to show that Jews have a secret plan to take over the world and is believed by many people in Europe and the Middle East; it is completely false yet has been believed and acted on by millions of people. So there definitely is no good reason for faith in the truth of something merely because it has been published or is in writing. My field is International Relations. Many government and national leaders deliberately or accidentally distort much of what they say and write. Good written material can be tremendously valuable in studying many subjects. It ought always to be looked for. But its absence does not necessarily prevent learning a great deal about a subject and drawing intelligent conclusions about it.

By the way, the relative absence now of documents in the study of the Melungeons and the Ottoman/Turkish-Melungeon relationship does not mean that exceptionally valuable written material does not exist, just that it has not come to light yet. I suspect there is a great deal of useful material in the Ottoman, Spanish, and Portuguese national archives just waiting to be discovered.

Well, how about “unanimity”? Forget about it. It will never exist. Take the subject of the Jewish holocaust in WWII. Among other things, the Nazi were meticulous record keepers. All of their records are in safe keeping. And there is SO much else! The evidence for the occurrence of the holocaust can be measured by the miles and tons! In factual terms, arguing against it is almost as absurd as arguing that WW II did not occur. Yet there are some people today who deny that the holocaust ever occurred or claim it was far less bad than the evidence overwhelmingly shows. Books have even been published with these ridiculous claims. So, no, unanimity of agreement about the Melungeon hypothesis almost certainly will never exist regardless of the extent of the evidence supporting it.

What about “finality”, a closing of the subject? But in the Social Sciences at least (and in most other subject areas too), no subject is ever closed. Scholars are always free to challenge any fact or conclusion and to attempt to show why they are correct. When they can successfully do this, the subject is re-opened. And it is desirable. To freeze a subject once and for all tends to be harmful in the long run. So most likely controversy about the Melungeon hypothesis will continue as long as someone remains interested in it but that is very okay. It is healthy.


CONCLUSION : THE BOOK – FROM ANATOLIA TO APPALACHIA

I was hesitant about choosing today’s main topic for a number of reasons. One of them was that it would present a distorted picture of the nature and subject matter of the book. What I’ve discussed are important aspects of the book but they are far from dominating it. Even more important topics of the book are the development of current and growing relations between Melungeons and Turks, why they are developing, how the people involved feel about it, and what hopes they have for it. All of this has been omitted so far from my talk but it is exceptionally important.

In addition, it should be emphasized that the relationship is ongoing, all of the people involved are alive and many are active. There is no final story to tell. The future will be what is made of it. Why wait to tell this story until most of these people have passed from the scene? Now is the time to explore it, near its inception, and so that is what Brent and I have done in the book. I needed to say that.

Finally, I want to say a few words about why the Turkish-Melungeon relationship matters. After all, it is not famous or important, is it? Well, it certainly is not “famous” but how about “important”? Let’s talk about what is important. The story deals in part with self-discovery, identity, freedom, connectivity with others, and belonging. It also involves intelligence, courage, integrity (personal and professional), kindness, generosity, endurance, decency, even love. Do these matter?

In our society today, “conflict” is news, “sex” and “violence” sells products, and insults qualify people as “experts” on television political discussion shows. Our book has virtually none of this, I am delighted to state here. I view it as a fairly joyful story, clean, kind, and optimistic.

What matters in life? Connectivity with others matters, simple decency matters, fairness matters a lot, integrity, kindness, inner strength, they all matter more than I can say. They always have and they always will. Perhaps stories with these qualities do not sell well in the modern market place but life would be hell without them. They are a good part of what many people attempt to live by and for. So the Melungeon story with its Ottoman/Turkish-Melungeon connection matters. The people involved matter. And the book matters too; it has its story to tell, small in some ways, larger in others. It is part of the story of human survival. It is part of the story of the attempt of people throughout centuries to live decently and well. In short, it is part of what humans have made of themselves so far. It definitely has value.

I am pleased I had the opportunity to work on the book with Brent. It was well worth my time and effort. Just having had it published is sufficient reward for me. My hope now is that others find something of value in it.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Joseph Scolnick is professor of Political Science at the University of Virginia’s College at Wise, and the author, with Brent Kennedy, of From Anatolia to Appalachia: A Turkish-American Dialogue.

Frank Sweet presentation, 2004

Published by:

Afro-European Genetic Admixture in the United States

Frank Sweet’s June 17 presentation at Fifth Union was entitled “Americans Are More Racially Mixed Than They Imagine.” The link below connects to a similar presentation made a short time before Fifth Union, comeplete with graphs and pictures.

http://backintyme.com/essay040608.htm

 

 

Since retiring as electrical engineer and school librarian, respectively, Frank and Mary Lee Sweet have interpreted living history as a hobby / business under the name “Backintyme.” They don period dress, perform 19th century music (banjo, guitar, percussion), and tell anecdotes from Florida’s past at museums, libraries, private functions, and state and national historic sites. Their website is athttp://www.backintyme.com. In support of this activity, Frank has published eleven historical booklets that are currently sold at museum and state park gift shops throughout Florida. Backintyme’s special area of interest is in the origins, and unfolding of North America’s odd “race” notion. Frank earned a Master’s in Civil War Studies from American Military University in Manassas, Virginia in the fall of 2001. As of this writing, in June 2004, he is a Ph.D. candidate in U.S. history at the University of Florida in Gainesville Florida. His dissertation title is “A Brief History of the One-Drop Rule.”

Jerry Warsing presentation, 2004

Published by:

The East Asian Factor

by Jerry Warsing
Presented at Fifth Union
Kingsport, Tennessee
Friday, 19 June 2004

Who are the Melungeons? I only learned of their existence in approximately the year 1996. I quickly learned their origins were shrouded in secrecy, and felt some people knew something about who they were, but were for some reason reluctant to make the knowledge public. I also felt most were truly ignorant of their heritage, and wanted to know who they were. I saw that the HERITAGE was lost, but felt it had only recently been lost. SECRETS ALWAYS make me very curious. I learned early that people, like governments, shroud what they consider unpopular, illegal, or prejudicial in secrecy. People hide facts about themselves that can bring harm or prejudice upon themselves. If that is done for 4 or more generations, heritage is lost. I quickly made it my quest to try to determine the ORIGINS OF THE MELUNGEONS. I don’t like secrets. I like truth. That search has taken me on some interesting journeys through cyber-space, books, dusty libraries, and even my own mind.

I have to tell you something about myself to explain my interest in this project. I began working on this by determining the SECRETS of my own ancestry. To solve the riddle of my ancestry. From the earliest time I sensed secrecy in my heritage. My grandmother told me some of my ancestry when I was around 5 or 6 years of age and I was interested at the time, but didn’t know enough to ask questions. My grand mothers name was Laura Jane Walls. Her maiden name was Laura Jane Trent, and her mothers name was Arminda Collins. One of Arminda Collins younger brothers was Samuel Collins, who was the father of Eula Collins Conley. Many of you have heard of her. Although I have many Melungeon genes through the Collins, Mullins, and I believe Trents, I don’t consider myself Melungeon, as I don’t have the heritage. Anyway, around late 1944 or early 1945 I saw my grandmother reading a newspaper, and to this day I remember the headlines “Hitler killed millions of Jews and Gypsies !” My grandmothers comments were, almost proudly, “He didn’t get them all – My people are all over the world now!” I asked her what she meant. What she said made me feel proud. She said “my people , the Romani, are all over the world now”. (I understood later she was speaking of the Gypsies, and that Gypsy is a derogatory name for Romani.) I asked her “Don’t you mean Romans?” I had heard of Romans, but had not heard of Romani. and she said “No. Romans are something else. You have to put an “ I “ on the end of Roman to spell what we are. Our people are like one huge extended family. A week or so later she told me – in a sing song voice – the oral history which had been passed to her – It was about her ancestors being forced to settle under Henry VIII, about Wm and Mary, Elizabeth Ist, etc., and also of being forced to go to Holland, and eventually coming to America. She also told me of “bad acts” committed against her people who had remained in England by Oliver Cromwell. They were “unmentionalble”, she said. One of the “unmentionable acts”, I later learned, was to send them to the Caribbean as slaves to work the sugar cane. My people weren’t sent to the Caribbean, but part of my peoples extended family were sent there. As my grandmother and I really never discussed this anymore, I soon forgot about it. Looking back now – what she told me made me feel proud at the time.

Fast forward: Around 1996 I read a brief article written by Dr. Kennedy which was published in the Richmond, Virginia, Times-Dispatch with some information about the upcoming First Union. He mentioned names of families that were some of the people of a group known collectively as Melungeons. I didn’t remember ever hearing or reading the word before. Two of those family names were Collins and Mullins, and I recognized the names as being some of my own family names. I grew up in southern West Virginia, and lived the first 7 or 8 years of my life with my mother and my grandmother. I know I’m not Melungeon, as I don’t have the heritage. I do have some of the genes. I’m not Rom, or Gypsy either. I at one time thought I was. Dr. Ian Hancock, head of the Romani Union, told me I’m not Rom. I didn’t like it at the time, but now I understand – although I have a little heritage, and have some of the genes, its not much. I didn’t like it at the time, but now I accept it. I do know who I am. So; I said to myself. I’m not Melungeon, I’m not Romani. Who am I?? I had my own DNA test done about a year ago to see if I might have the East Asian DNA, and to my surprise discovered that I have 12% native American DNA, and of course the rest being Indo-European. No EA. NOW I know who I am. I have always known that diversity in genes is good. So; I have American Indian genes, and I have Indian- Indian genes. And I have European genes. Can anyone have more diverse genes than that?? I had long suspected Black genes, but didn’t have them. I’m sorry I don’t have – I firmly believe DIVERSITY of ones genes make for a more complete person.

Can anyone have more diverse genes? Yep. My little girl does. She is 6% American Indian, part Rom (INDIAN – Indian) part Tatar (Mongolian), and part European (Russian, English, French, Irish, Portuguese, Etc). She is ALL Mongrelian. I’m just part Mongrelian.

What REALLY got me into this was the apparent MYSTERY of the origins of the Melungeons. I knew enough to know that mystery and SECRETS – whether about people, politics, or whatever, generally are an attempt to hide something considered unfavorable by others. People and governments maintain secrets to hide truth. Some people who know about what I’m doing have asked me why I have been working on this. As one of my favorite writers – Paul Krugman, who is a syndicated OP-ED columnist might say – the reason, folks, is to FIND THE TRUTH, AND BE ABLE TO TALK ABOUT IT.

Who are the Melungeons? The Melungeons are composed of at least several assimilated core groups : 1. Native Americans 2.Croatians (area of the former Yugoslavia) 3. English people from the so called ‘Lost Colony’ 4. Portuguese 5. Spanish from the Spanish colony of Santa Elena and the abandoned Spanish Forts 6. Various ship wrecked peoples who traveled inland to get away from the violent dangers of the Atlantic coast 7. Rom who were originally sent to America by the English as indentured servants, and also Rom who were freed of enslavement by the English in 1719 from the Caribbean and dumped at Port Elizabeth in the Carolinas. Incidentally, many of the existing Melungeon black genes probably came from the black overseers who took Rom slave girls as concubines. This information is from The PATRIN, a Rom Web site.8. East Asians; Mongol and Chinese people who had been shipwrecked off the coast of North Carolina and Virginia probably due to a hurricane. They were shipwrecked while attempting to colonize the east coast of the present United States.

This is about the EAST ASIAN FACTION of the Melungeons. The quest itself has been interesting. I have had support from others; particularily Gavin Menzies, author of the book 1421, The Year China discovered America. Gavin immediately understood my search as one that complemented his work, and might even VALIDATE his findings. He funded our recent DNA study of the Melungeons, and has given me much more assistance.

Ladies and gentlemen, among other things we HAVE VALIDATED the work of Gavin Menzies. We have discovered EA DNA among the Melungeons; and coupled with confirming information from others that MORE EA DNA does exist among Melungeons, Menzies work has been VALIDATED.!

Ladies and gentlemen, if you are interested in this heritage, you should read Gavin Menzies book 1421, The Year China Discovered America. It’s a book on which Menzies worked many years – its well documented, and contains literally THOUSANDS of pieces of information which proves the Chinese were not only here, but also discovered and explored the rest of the world in the early 1400’s. Menzies has also discovered without doubt the Croatians were on the coast of Virginia as early as 1440, and that the Portuguese settled Puerto Rico as early as 1444. That’s new public information, and will probably be presented in a revised book, and possibly in a PBS special which will be presented later this Summer or Fall.

I’ve been working with Menzies for the past couple of years. I have found the Chinese DID settle America without doubt. I have found PROOF of one place they settled, and that place is RIGHT HERE IN MELUNGEON AMERICA! WE HAVE EAST ASIAN DNA right here! We are sure they came, and we are sure they are still here. Yes, folks, Columbus did come to America, but he came 70 years after the Chinese, and he came using Chinese maps! He DID NOT come to the Appalachians. Columbus – til his dying day – believed he had actually reached some part of East Asia when he landed on Cuba, and spent a few days there. I finally understand why he thought that – the people he encountered were actually Chinese who had been there for around 3 generations – I wondered about his confusion ; now I UNDERSTAND why he was confused!

I have forever been dissatisfied with the complacent, pat history presented concerning Pre-Colonial and Colonial History of America. I have always had questions about settlement of the East Coast of America. I have always had questions about what happened between 1492 when Columbus supposedly discovered America, and 1608 when the English settled Jamestown. I know where there are voids in information there are secrets. There was a void of over a hundred years in discoveries – Oh, there was mention of John Cabot and Henry Hudson, but not much more. There was no mention of Spanish settlement. Those same history patterns were not only in elementary and high school history, but also in college history. I always wondered ‘WHY’? I discovered the answer to that ‘WHY’ several years ago.

The answer is this; the slant of the writing of history, like political writing and news, is determined by whomever controls the MEDIA. History is part of Politics (Who gets what, and when they get it). As a consequence of the slant of history, modern Melungeons have known very little about their ancestry (except through oral history) until recently. History is periodically rewritten. The time has come for pre-colonial American History to be re written again.

 

Fast forward: Around 1996 I read a brief article written by Dr. Kennedy which was published in the Richmond, Virginia, Times-Dispatch with some information about the upcoming First Union. He mentioned names of families that were some of the people of a group known collectively as Melungeons. I didn’t remember ever hearing or reading the word before. Two of those family names were Collins and Mullins, and I recognized the names as being some of my own family names. I grew up in southern West Virginia, and lived the first 7 or 8 years of my life with my mother and my grandmother. I know I’m not Melungeon, as I don’t have the heritage. I do have some of the genes. I’m not Rom, or Gypsy either. I at one time thought I was. Dr. Ian Hancock, head of the Romani Union, told me I’m not Rom. I didn’t like it at the time, but now I understand – although I have a little heritage, and have some of the genes, its not much. I didn’t like it at the time, but now I accept it. I do know who I am. So; I said to myself. I’m not Melungeon, I’m not Romani. Who am I?? I had my own DNA test done about a year ago to see if I might have the East Asian DNA, and to my surprise discovered that I have 12% native American DNA, and of course the rest being Indo-European. No EA. NOW I know who I am. I have always known that diversity in genes is good. So; I have American Indian genes, and I have Indian- Indian genes. And I have European genes. Can anyone have more diverse genes than that?? I had long suspected Black genes, but didn’t have them. I’m sorry I don’t have – I firmly believe DIVERSITY of ones genes make for a more complete person.

Can anyone have more diverse genes? Yep. My little girl does. She is 6% American Indian, part Rom (INDIAN – Indian) part Tatar (Mongolian), and part European (Russian, English, French, Irish, Portuguese, Etc). She is ALL Mongrelian. I’m just part Mongrelian.

What REALLY got me into this was the apparent MYSTERY of the origins of the Melungeons. I knew enough to know that mystery and SECRETS – whether about people, politics, or whatever, generally are an attempt to hide something considered unfavorable by others. People and governments maintain secrets to hide truth. Some people who know about what I’m doing have asked me why I have been working on this. As one of my favorite writers – Paul Krugman, who is a syndicated OP-ED columnist might say – the reason, folks, is to FIND THE TRUTH, AND BE ABLE TO TALK ABOUT IT.

Who are the Melungeons? The Melungeons are composed of at least several assimilated core groups : 1. Native Americans 2.Croatians (area of the former Yugoslavia) 3. English people from the so called ‘Lost Colony’ 4. Portuguese 5. Spanish from the Spanish colony of Santa Elena and the abandoned Spanish Forts 6. Various ship wrecked peoples who traveled inland to get away from the violent dangers of the Atlantic coast 7. Rom who were originally sent to America by the English as indentured servants, and also Rom who were freed of enslavement by the English in 1719 from the Caribbean and dumped at Port Elizabeth in the Carolinas. Incidentally, many of the existing Melungeon black genes probably came from the black overseers who took Rom slave girls as concubines. This information is from The PATRIN, a Rom Web site.8. East Asians; Mongol and Chinese people who had been shipwrecked off the coast of North Carolina and Virginia probably due to a hurricane. They were shipwrecked while attempting to colonize the east coast of the present United States.

This is about the EAST ASIAN FACTION of the Melungeons. The quest itself has been interesting. I have had support from others; particularily Gavin Menzies, author of the book 1421, The Year China discovered America. Gavin immediately understood my search as one that complemented his work, and might even VALIDATE his findings. He funded our recent DNA study of the Melungeons, and has given me much more assistance.

Ladies and gentlemen, among other things we HAVE VALIDATED the work of Gavin Menzies. We have discovered EA DNA among the Melungeons; and coupled with confirming information from others that MORE EA DNA does exist among Melungeons, Menzies work has been VALIDATED.!

Ladies and gentlemen, if you are interested in this heritage, you should read Gavin Menzies book 1421, The Year China Discovered America. It’s a book on which Menzies worked many years – its well documented, and contains literally THOUSANDS of pieces of information which proves the Chinese were not only here, but also discovered and explored the rest of the world in the early 1400’s. Menzies has also discovered without doubt the Croatians were on the coast of Virginia as early as 1440, and that the Portuguese settled Puerto Rico as early as 1444. That’s new public information, and will probably be presented in a revised book, and possibly in a PBS special which will be presented later this Summer or Fall.

I’ve been working with Menzies for the past couple of years. I have found the Chinese DID settle America without doubt. I have found PROOF of one place they settled, and that place is RIGHT HERE IN MELUNGEON AMERICA! WE HAVE EAST ASIAN DNA right here! We are sure they came, and we are sure they are still here. Yes, folks, Columbus did come to America, but he came 70 years after the Chinese, and he came using Chinese maps! He DID NOT come to the Appalachians. Columbus – til his dying day – believed he had actually reached some part of East Asia when he landed on Cuba, and spent a few days there. I finally understand why he thought that – the people he encountered were actually Chinese who had been there for around 3 generations – I wondered about his confusion ; now I UNDERSTAND why he was confused!

I have forever been dissatisfied with the complacent, pat history presented concerning Pre-Colonial and Colonial History of America. I have always had questions about settlement of the East Coast of America. I have always had questions about what happened between 1492 when Columbus supposedly discovered America, and 1608 when the English settled Jamestown. I know where there are voids in information there are secrets. There was a void of over a hundred years in discoveries – Oh, there was mention of John Cabot and Henry Hudson, but not much more. There was no mention of Spanish settlement. Those same history patterns were not only in elementary and high school history, but also in college history. I always wondered ‘WHY’? I discovered the answer to that ‘WHY’ several years ago.

The answer is this; the slant of the writing of history, like political writing and news, is determined by whomever controls the MEDIA. History is part of Politics (Who gets what, and when they get it). As a consequence of the slant of history, modern Melungeons have known very little about their ancestry (except through oral history) until recently. History is periodically rewritten. The time has come for pre-colonial American History to be re written again.

How did the East Asians get here??

Admiral Zheng He (Cheng Ho) (1371-1433), who had made at least 6 previous voyages for the Ming Dynasties Emperor Zhu Di, and had explored the world, discovering America at least as early as 1421 was ordered by Emperor Zhu Zhanji (1425-1435), the new emperor, to conduct a 7th expedition. It appears to have been an expedition to colonize the world. It also appears to me to have been a banishment of a defeated people from mainland China. Cheng Ho, as were his followers, were defeated Mongols primarily from the Chinese Province of Yunnan. They were Muslims who the Ming Dynasty had not been able to assimilate into Confucian society.

I also believe the Emperor had included amongst the colonists others he did not want in China, such as people with unknown diseases or physical impairments. Its my opinion Machado-Josephs originated in Yunnan, and was transported through Chinese trade routes which were later inherited by the Portuguese. Menzies has lots of information on the existence of early Machado-Josephs in Yunnan, and without prior contact with the Portuguese.

As many of you know banishment of defeated peoples – ones that aren’t killed – has always been a way used to maintain domestic order and tranquility. What immediately comes to my mind is the deportation of the Huguenots from France in the 17th century.

The 7th voyage met with disaster. Cheng Ho again went to the west – this time with 400 ships, many as big as his flagship. The ships carried as many as 100,000 people – men, women, and children – also everything necessary to establish colonies from seeds for planting to mongolian ponies. They even had horse ships. Cheng Ho’s flag ship was 475 feet long. As a comparison, Christopher Columbus flagship, the Santa Maria, was only 78 feet long. Cheng Ho commanded on his 7th and final voyage a fleet of 400 ocean going ships that included hundreds of sailors per ship other than the colonists. They carried homing pigeons in case of shipwreck. Marco Polo reported the Chinese had four masted ocean going craft with 60 cabins and 300 men crews. Its known many of Cheng Ho’s ships had 7 masts. It is also noteworthy the ships carried gardens and all provisions required so as not to depend on barbarian suppliers.

The Armada set sail in the Spring of 1431, and sailed toward the Cape of Good Hope the southern tip of Africa. They traded as they went, and dropped off people along the way as colonists to establish trading centers. Those people who were dropped off are today known as the ‘Overseas Chinese’. When the armada rounded the southern tip of Africa, it encountered a violent storm. Half the ships turned back because of the storm, and the other half were not heard from again in China. Most of them, however, I believe did make it to the East Coast of what is now the United States where they apparently encountered a hurricane, as years later many wrecked ships which met descriptions of the huge Chinese junks were found by others from Florida all the way to Greenland. One ship, which met the description of a hugh chinese junk, was found during the time of George Washington (over 300 years later) deep in the Dismal Swamp of Virginia. Its remains were excavated in 1929 by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, but we have not yet been able to retrieve copies of any of the documents.

OK. Menzies traced the EA DNA to the shores of America. I traced it to the Appalachians. How did I get it to the Appalachians and the Melungeons? I did it by studying maps – I noticed and studied names of places and names of peoples. I studied characteristics of Melungeons and others – and I read some early english writing.

Captain John Smith’s writings and descriptions of the time he was held prisoner by Powhatan was particularily revealing. Powhatan described to him people who had earlier built two story stone houses and abandoned them during his lifetime. I knew the Chinese built with stone. They were referred to as the Oceanye Ho. The spelling was essentially reversed on the work that I read, but seen with a mirror it would have said Oceanye Ho. Also, a Chinese scribe writing English would write in reverse. To me that meant Ocean People of Ho. I concluded they were survivors of one of the Chinese shipwrecks at the very least, and maybe survivors of an actual Chinese settlement. John Smith also mentioned seeing a Chinese Lacquered box while a prisoner of Powhatan. Only the Chinese made lacquered boxes at that time. Other peoples started doing it almost 300 years later during the 18th century. From what John Smith said I concluded that those people had indeed been followers of Ho, and had probably moved inland. Coincidentally, I spent my high school years in a small town in WyoMing County in southern West Virginia named Oceana. It was pronounced at that time OCEANA, but all the old timers called it OCEANYE. I always wondered at the time why a town would be spelled one way and pronounced another. I have since concluded that is where the OCEANYE HO settled for a while after they left Tidewater Virginia. I also believe it’s a possibility SHAWNEE might be a corruption of OCEANYE. I know for a fact the SHAWNEE did travel east to west down the Guyandotte River to the Ohio river. That’s some oral history, too. Oceana is on the Clear Fork of the Guyandotte about 6 miles from the main river. We haven’t done DNA studies on the SHAWNEE yet, but I hope to do it at some later time. The majority of Shawnee now live in Oklahoma, as they were moved there during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Remember the ‘Trail of Tears’?

I also know SHAWNEE and MINGO are related. Shawnee prisoners taken at the battle of Fallen Timbers protested to their captors that the were ‘not Indians’. WORDS: There are several MING words in the East. I don’t believe its coincidence. I believe the words described the people in some way. Words such as Wyoming, Lycoming, and Mingo are three of interest to me. Mingo County and Wyoming County are adjacent counties in southern West Virginia. I believe Mingo is a corruption of MING HO, or Ming Dynasty followers of Cheng Ho. While studying maps, I found an area on the Atlantic coast near South Port, North Carolina, named the Mingo area. I tried getting additional information from the South Port Chamber of Commerce, but they stated they knew nothing about it. I also notice on a map of North Carolina a small town near I –95 named Mingo. Obviously, I concluded, the Ming Ho had made land fall at the vicinity of South Port, and had eventually moved inland to the Appalachians for protection from all the traffic of maurauders, pirates, etc. traveling up the Atlantic shore. I believe the EA DNA found amongst the Melungeons came from descendants of the Ming Ho people – who are now known as the Mingo Indians.

The word Wyoming, which is a County name in West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and New York, and of course is the name of a western state, the State of Wyoming. The word means , supposedly, ‘of the great plain’ in the language of Delaware Indians. I ask myself WHY do the people of the state of Wyoming name themselves using a word common to the language of Delaware Indians ? Delaware Indians are from the Atlantic coast of the present United States. Also, the Poconos of New York/Pennsylvania are not on a plain, and of course neither is Wyoming County, West Virginia. I have another definition of the word – that definition is ‘Ming people from the great oceans’. ( A Plain)

Other clues which led me to the Melungeons?? There are lots of them; from the so-called Melungeon squat (the Melungeon squat refers to the fact Melungeons, when doing ground work, would invariably squat on their haunches, rather than kneel or sit. Chinese do the same thing , and both would do it hours at a time), to the slanted eyes of some of the people. Many Melungeons actually resemble after almost 600 years Mongolian people from the Yunnan countryside in China today!. ANOTHER WORD WE ALL KNOW: USENS! Usens means ‘Our People’ in Mongolian, and it means essentially the same thing in Appalachianese.

How did the Melungeons get here?? Simple. They walked toward the sunset; except those who were riding mongolian ponies!!

Questions? Read Gavin Menzies book – he has thousands of documented answers throughout. Other good books to read would be the one by Dr. Kennedy, The Melungeons , and Wayne Winklers book Walking Toward the Sunset.

Thank you all for attending my presentation. For those of you who did not attend, above is basically what I said. Unfortunately, I forgot to leave my e-mail addresses so here they are: jerrywarsing@hotmail.com; and oceanye@adelphia.net If you have questions, thoughts or whatever please don’t hesitate writing me. Please use jerrywarsing@hotmail.com. if you write during the month of July as I will be able to access only that one then. I’m going to be in Mexico during the month of July, and probably won’t have much time then to correspond, but please write me anyway, and I’ll do my best. We are also very interested in obtaining names and addresses of people who have positive EA DNA. We will pursue all leads! If you have EA DNA PLEASE contact me! If you want to know where to get a DNA test please contact me.

Thanks !

Jerry Warsing is a West Virginia native with several family connections to the Melungeons. He holds a BA Degree from Marshall University in Comprehensive Social Studies and Education, has been working for two years as a researcher for Dr. Gavin Menzies, author of 1421: The Year the Chinese Discovered America.

David Arnett presentation, 2006

Published by:

The Importance of the Melungeon Community to Turkish-American Relations

by David Arnett

Sixth Union
Kingsport, Tennessee
June 9, 2006

I would like to begin by expressing heartfelt greetings to all of you from the great people of Turkey. I am a proud American, of course, and a career Foreign Service Officer of the United States, but I have also spent nine years of my life in Turkey, and I know the tremendous affection that Turks feel in their hearts for all of you. In fact, Turks are much more likely than Americans to know about you, the Melungeons, or Meluncanlar in Turkish.

Of course, not all Melungeons trace their roots to Turkey. We come from many ethnic backgrounds, but I promise you that the Turks embrace you all, just on the chance that some part of your genetic makeup may also be Turkish or perhaps traced to one of the areas that was a part of the Ottoman Empire.

One of the most heart-warming aspects of the Turkish character and tradition is the love of family. Another is the extraordinary sense of hospitality. When these two are combined—family and hospitality—you can begin to understand why Melungeons receive such a warm welcome in Turkey. That welcome is very similar to what you will find in Tennessee, or in my father’s home state, Kentucky, when relatives, kinfolk, return to their homes. Nothing is too good for such visitors. The best food is served, the best china is used, and the host will sleep on the floor if he has to so that his guests can have the most comfortable bed. In Turkey, the poorest villager will offer whatever he has to a visiting stranger, particularly a foreigner, out of a time-honored sense of hospitality and honor.

That sense of honor also still links the Turks with the Melungeons and the people of Appalachia. As a former Army officer, I learned to esteem the ideals of “Duty, Honor, Country.” They are still the highest ideals in the Armed Services of both the United States and Turkey, and I believe that they are still most alive in the general population in this region of the country, where the Melungeons are most prevalent. Of course, a noble sense of honor can sometimes evolve into something destructive, such as with the blood feuds that still existed in my grandfather’s day in Kentucky and still exist today in some of the remote parts of eastern Turkey. The phrase in Turkish is almost the same—“kandavasi” or a “blood matter.”

But a genuine sense of honor is to be admired, and honor and pride are both alive and well today in Turkey. Where we have only one word for honor, there are many such words in Turkish, and those same words are also used for people’s names. Certainly for me, it has been an honor to live and work in Turkey, and an honor also to be among you today.

I have served in Turkey three times, from 1983 to 1987 as the Press Attache at the American Embassy in Ankara, the capital of Turkey; from 1995 to 1997 as the Counselor for Public Affairs at the Embassy in Ankara; and from 2002 to 2005 as the Consul General, or the head of the American Consulate, in Turkey’s largest city and the former capital of the Ottoman Empire, Istanbul.

I would like to tell you a little story, a true story, about my introduction to Turkey and the strong connection that I have felt to the country from the very beginning. It happened in 1983, when I first arrived in Ankara. On my first night in the city, I stepped out on to the balcony of my high-rise apartment and looked out at the lights of the city twinkling within the bowl-shaped area in which it lies and up in the surrounding hills. It was a beautiful evening, and, when I lifted my eyes from the city lights to look at the early night sky, I was truly surprised to see in perfect clarity the crescent moon and a single star that lay just to the side of it. That crescent and that star on a field of red comprise the Turkish flag, and I had thought that they were only symbolic. But there in the sky above me lay that same crescent moon and star together, and I had the feeling that I was being welcomed home somehow, that the country’s flag had been planted above me somehow as a sign of welcome and return. I never again saw the moon and star aligned so perfectly.

I had not heard of Melungeons at that time, and I had no idea at all that I might also trace my roots to Turkey. It was during my second tour in Turkey, in 1995 or 1996, when I first began to hear a fascinating legend about the crew of a Turkish ship that had found itself on the eastern coast of the United States centuries before and had worked its way inland and settled in the broad Appalachian region. I have heard two versions, (1) that the ship foundered off the coast, and (2) that the ship was captured by the British from the Spaniards after the battle of Lepanto and brought to the New World. In any case, I found the story interesting, but I did not focus on it, because I thought that it had no direct bearing on me. I was pleased, though, as an American diplomat stationed in Turkey, to learn that Americans with possible Turkish heritage were coming to Turkey and being very warmly received.

In 2004, in Istanbul, I was invited by the Turkish-American University Association to attend a lecture on Melungeons, and I was fascinated to learn that one of the families associated with the Melungeons is the Crow family, since my father’s mother was a Crow. I then remembered that my father’s father was rather dark-skinned with blue eyes and that both of them came from southern Kentucky. My father was born, in fact, within a hundred yards or so of the Tennessee border. The photographs that I have of my grandfather show a man who could easily be Turkish.

In 2005, with that information in hand, I began to mention to my Turkish friends that it might even be possible that I too shared in their Turkish heritage. I mentioned this also in an early farewell speech and said that although I could not be at all sure that I had Turkish blood in my veins, I would definitely carry Turkey always in my heart. The next day, the possibility that I might be partly Turkish was carried on the front pages of the national press and on the television news channels. Given the huge interest that had been generated by the media, I arranged to have a DNA test conducted through the labs in Oxford, England. To my great pleasure, the results indicated that I share my genes on my father’s side with a full 25% of the Turks. And that is in part why I stand before you today.

The other reason is to emphasize the very great importance of Turkish-American relations and the role that the Melungeon community can play in strengthening and improving those relations.

Turkey is important to the United States. Like the United States, Turkey is a remarkable melting pot of civilizations and cultures. It lies at the heart of nearly every regional issue of concern to the United States. Whether one discusses current events in the Middle East, the Balkans, the Caucasus, Central Asia, or Europe itself, Turkey is an important key to both regional and world stability. Turkey and Israel have long been the only real democracies in the Middle East region. And Turkey’s ties to Israel are important factors in the search for lasting peace in the region.

The United States strongly supports Turkey’s entry into the European Union, and we view its success as a secular democracy as an essential element in the prevention of any potential “clash of civilizations.” Turkey is one of our strongest and most reliable NATO allies. It is the only Muslim-majority country in NATO. We can boast of over fifty years as NATO allies and as many years of joining hands around the world to bring peace and security to troubled regions. We used to say: “From Korea to Kosovo.” Now we say: “From Korea to Kabul.” Add to that two centuries of commercial interaction and a century and a half of educational exchange, and our countries are linked as allies, trading partners, and friends.

The primary focus of American policy in Turkey is to support Turkey’s efforts to achieve the ambitious economic and political goals that the Turkish people have set for themselves. By becoming an official candidate for membership in the European Union, Turkey has signaled strongly that its place is in Europe. Just as important, all Turkish citizens will benefit from an open, transparent, democratic system that respects their individual rights and freedoms. Turks are justifiably proud of what they have achieved over the past few years, and the United States will continue to support the process of reform.

Inflation in Turkey is lower than it has been in a generation, and real interest rates have declined sharply. Turkish companies are exporting at record levels. Total annual trade between the United States and Turkey is at a level of some 9 billion dollars.

With nearly 12,000 Turkish students enrolled in U.S. universities, Turkey sends more students to the U.S. than any other European country. Turkish students are currently enrolled in all fifty U.S. states.

We are also engaged together in many places around the world to achieve solutions to regional conflicts. Turkey’s role in Afghanistan is a case in point. Turkey has successfully commanded the International Security Assistance Force in Kabul twice, and participated in the initial training of the Afghan National Army. Turkey is an important donor for reconstruction. The inauguration of the Kabul-Kandahar highway, built by U.S. and Turkish companies, is a good example of our common approach.

Turkey can certainly serve as an example of a country with a large Muslim-majority population that is also democratic and secular. We refrain from saying that Turkey is a model, but rather an example, because it has its own unique history and a founding father, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, who was one of the greatest leaders of the 20th century. We also do not speak of our own country, the United States of America, the oldest continuous democracy in the world, as a model for the rest of the world, because we have our own unique history. There is no perfect democracy, because people are not perfect. But the genius of democracy is that it accepts that people are not perfect and provides for peaceful change.

The U.S. and Turkey have worked together closely to address our various interests over the Iraq issue. Turkey has legitimate regional security concerns, and we have sought to address them. We have repeated very often that we stand firm on maintaining the territorial integrity of Iraq, that we are opposed to a separate Kurdish state, and that our vision is of an Iraq where all ethnic groups, the Turkomen certainly among them, will have their rights, representation and access to the nation’s wealth protected.

On June 12, 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell sent a message to the City of Istanbul at the opening ceremony for our new Consulate there. These are his words: “The United States and Turkey are great nations. As Ataturk said, we have both been inspired by democratic ideals, and this experience indeed deepens our friendship. Both Turks and Americans are focused on the future, a future that will be a very bright one for the Turkish people despite the many challenges you face today. It will be bright for the same reason that my country’s future is bright: because innovative people freed to use their creativity and initiative can produce wonders.”

Hundreds of thousands of Americans visit Turkey every year. At the Consulate General in Istanbul alone, we processed more than 65,000 visas for Turkish citizens each year, and many thousands of Americans have made Turkey their permanent home. Turkey is a beautiful country with spectacular tourism sites, enviable weather, great cuisine, and people whose hospitality is known throughout the world.

We want the great and sovereign Republic of Turkey to remain exactly what it is—a strong secular democracy that is perfecting the democratic rights of its people and moving ever closer to full integration with Europe.

Just as the Ottoman Empire once extended from Central Europe through the Middle East and North Africa to the Arabian Gulf and the very borders of South Asia, Turkey today forms a bridge between Europe and Asia, a bridge between the ancient and modern worlds, and a bridge between Islam and the West. It is also one of the most beautiful and interesting countries in the world.

So, what problems could possibly exist between us? Unfortunately, there are some. Most of them began with the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Our government believed that the Turkish Parliament would approve the movement of our 4th Infantry Division and Turkish troops through southern Turkey and into northern Iraq as a major part of the battle plan. In fact, both governments expected approval, and so did both militaries. However, on March 1, 2003, despite the yes votes outnumbering the no votes, the small number of abstentions meant that the motion to approve did not have the support of a majority in the Parliament that day. In fact, Turkey did approve the dispatch of many thousands of troops to Iraq on October 7 of that year, but that offer was eventually declined because of the opposition of many in Iraq itself.

The March 1 decision came as a shock and disappointment to many in Washington. Although our relations later improved, they have not been as close as before. Today, there are other concerns in Washington, focusing on high-level Turkish contacts with Syria and Hamas, at a time when unified world opposition to their activities in Lebanon and Palestine has been sought, and there are questions about Turkish policy in regard to Iran.

On the Turkish side, the fears that led to the rejection of the March 1 motion never materialized. There was no influx of Iraqi refugees into Turkey. The Turkish tourism industry and the Turkish economy as a whole have boomed since that time, although it was feared that both would be badly damaged.

However, on July 4, 2003, an event occurred that poisoned the relationship on the Turkish side. A small contingent of Turkish soldiers in the northern Iraq city of Sulaimaniye was arrested by American troops who were acting on reports that they were planning destabilizing actions in the region. As is customary with such arrests, they were handcuffed and bags were placed over their heads while they were transported to American facilities. Within a day or so, they were released, and high-level meetings were held between our two militaries in order to discuss the incident and avoid anything similar in the future.

That might have been the end of it, but reports were leaked to the Turkish media, and the entire country became inflamed by what was perceived to be a serious breach of Turkish honor. All of the polls in Turkey continue to confirm that the institution held in the greatest esteem by the Turkish people is the military. To dishonor the military is to dishonor the entire nation. To this day, many Turks believe that the Turkish uniform was dishonored that day, although their soldiers were actually in civilian clothes.

Nevertheless, that single incident has grown in the Turkish consciousness into a huge black mark against the United States. That has been coupled with a widely accepted but decidedly false belief that the United States supports the establishment of an independent Kurdish state in northern Iraq, which might tempt Turkish Kurds to demand their own state within the current boundaries of Turkey. That combination of beliefs has led to several popular books and films in the last year and a half in Turkey that have depicted the United States in very ugly terms and undermined the friendship between our two countries.

So, yes, there are some problems. And what does that mean for the Melungeon community, and how can we help?

There are at least two major points of convergence between Melungeons and the Turks. The first is the search for identity and a longing to belong to a wider community. The second, of course, is the genetic link in many of us and a shared physical heritage. I would like to explore both for a few minutes.

I believe it is true that nearly all of the world’s peoples are of mixed race and ethnic heritage. One of the differences with Melungeons is that we are well aware of that. And there is no doubt of that really with the people of the United States and Turkey. We are a land of immigrants, and modern Turkey is the heir of probably the greatest empire that the world has ever seen, the Ottoman Empire, which encompassed vast territories in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Central Asia, and a great mixed population drawn from all of those areas.

We have generally celebrated our mixed ethnic heritage in the United States, but modern Turks have not yet done the same. Against all odds at the end of the First World War, the great Turkish general and statesman Ataturk, himself a man with blond hair and blue eyes from Salonika, rallied his countrymen from the heart of the Turkish homeland, Anatolia, and beat back the Western powers that had tried to divide the country with the Treaty of Sevres and defeated the various minority groups that tried to secede and establish separate countries on what remained of Turkey. With the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923, Ataturk and his followers achieved their hard-fought independence and established the modern Republic of Turkey.

But it was held together by the will of Ataturk and a strong nationalism based upon pride in being a Turk. The most famous of so many revered statements by Ataturk is this: “How happy is the one who says I am a Turk.” Minorities have been viewed as threats that might fracture the unity of the new country. In addition, Ataturk disbanded the Caliphate, or the spiritual leadership of Islam that had been vested in the Sultan in Istanbul until 1923, and he also outlawed various religious orders in the country, in a successful attempt to steer Turkey toward the modern West and away from what he considered the backward ways of the traditional Arab world. He also championed the emancipation of women, Western dress, the Latin alphabet instead of the Arabic, and a series of other reforms that thrust the country into the 20th century and headlong toward the West.

And today, 83 years later, there is a national identity crisis in Turkey that is also being played out in the political world, because the reforms certainly changed the shape and practice of the state, as well as the surface of Turkish life throughout the country, but they left several unresolved questions to this day. For example, if the country is truly secular, then why does the government regulate religious practice and expression? In a true democracy, should the military have the right to intervene in political affairs? Should the country really fear the differences expressed by minority groups as threats to national unity, or should it not embrace those differences as they enrich the wider society? These and many other similar questions are being debated in Turkey today as a government with Islamist roots faces a skeptical military establishment and resistance from the secular establishment.

As Turks struggle with their internal identity, they are also compelled to re-examine their external or international identity. Turks will point to the map to help people understand their strategic situation. For example, during the Cold War, they were surrounded by the Soviet Union, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Warsaw Pact-member Bulgaria and NATO-ally but traditional rival Greece. The situation is better today, but relations are mixed with Russia, rather tense with Armenia, uncertain with Iran, Iraq, and Syria, and still not warm with Greece. The current government of Turkey appears to believe that Islam can be the unifying force that will create good relations with its Arab and Persian neighbors, but history does not provide much support for that view, and the Arabs have not forgotten that they were ruled by the Turks for centuries. At the same time, whenever Turkey reaches out to regimes considered totalitarian or terrorist or both by the West, it risks losing the friendship of Europe and the United States.

The U.S. has long supported full Turkish membership in the European Union and continues to do so, in the strong belief that such membership will anchor Turkey firmly and finally in the West and complete Ataturk’s vision of a country with a strong secular, liberal democracy that can proudly take
its place among the world’s most modern democratic states.

The polls in Turkey used to indicate that nearly 70% of the population supported Turkish membership in the EU, but that support has been steadily declining as new opposition to their membership has arisen in Europe, while some conservative forces in Turkey fear the loss of their traditional privileges if Turkey should become a member of the EU.

At the moment then, there is both a personal and national search for identity taking place in Turkey, and a genuine longing, I believe, to find or to create a wider sense of community and belonging. And isn’t that what we are doing here today as well—searching for identity and creating a sense of community?

In their search, Turks embrace anyone with Turkish roots. With the fall of the Soviet Union, Turkey reached out strongly and vigorously to the Turkic people of Central Asia in the newly independent states of Azerbaizan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. They expected that their ethnic connections would lead to enormous growth in trade and an economic windfall for Turkey. Indeed, many Turkish companies have done well in Central Asia, but the huge windfall never materialized.

Turkey has championed the Turkomen people in northern Iraq following the fall of Saddam, in part from a genuine sense of brotherhood, and in part because the Turkomen provide political leverage for Turkey in the Kurdish region of Iraq, a region that continues to haunt Turkish policy-makers.

The Turks have even claimed kinship with Native Americans, pointing to Turkish words in tribal languages, identical carpet designs, and other cultural and social similarities. And here, of course, we are back with Melungeons and the research of Brent Kennedy and many others. We do not have to speculate, as I have heard some Turks do, about a land bridge from Siberia and a crossing by Turkic peoples from Asia thousands of years ago, because there is a simpler and more convincing explanation known to all of us here—that Turks entered the country a few centuries ago from the east, not thousands of years ago from the north.

Just as Turks have reached out to other Turkic peoples around the world, they are indeed reaching out to you. What better way could there be to help mend the frayed edges of Turkish-American relations than to celebrate Turkish-Americans and welcome long lost relatives back to the ancestral fold?

The exact number of Turkish-Americans in the United States is not known. I have heard estimates ranging from 75,000 to 400,000. But that is before Melungeons are taken into account. There are some 100 Turkish-American Associations that I am aware of in the United States, and I believe that all of them would be very pleased to welcome any of you as members. The two largest federations are the Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA) and the Federation of Turkish American Associations, and both can be located easily through the Internet.

Most Americans, in fact, know very little about Turkey, and that is partly because until now there have been relatively few Turkish-Americans, as opposed to other much larger hyphenated American ethnic groups. There are no Turkish-Americans in our Congress, for example, although there is now a substantial Turkish caucus comprised of Members who are well aware of the importance of Turkish-American relations and the importance of Turkey to global peace, as well as the peaceful integration of Islamic traditions and the modern world.

Turkish-American organizations are backing the campaign of a Turkish-American running for Congress this fall in Maryland. I expect that there will be many more such candidates in the future. And I anticipate that many of you will be asked for your support in the future in regard to Turkish-American issues and concerns as word of the Melungeons and their numbers spreads in the American consciousness.

Regardless of your political beliefs, however, and regardless of whether you have any ancestral connection to Turkey, I hope that as many of you as possible will travel to that great country and experience the homecoming that will be offered to you as soon as you reveal that you are a Melungeon. Your very presence in Turkey and your interest in Turkish culture, history, and tradition can do wonders for the Turkish-American relationship.

Finally, I would like to say a few words about the genetic connection. In many cases, it is impossible to know exactly how or when other influences were added to our genetic makeup. In my own case, I thought that perhaps there would be indications that I had ancestors from the Mediterranean and even the eastern Mediterranean. But the DNA results came back with specific mention of Turkey. However, it is known that Turkic peoples also made their way as far north as Finland, and there appear to be similarities between Turkish and Finnish, particularly in sentence structure and grammar. That might help explain why my own DNA results also mention 20% Norwegian and a full 40% from the indigenous people of northern Scandinavia, the Sami. Arnett is actually a Scottish name, and it seems reasonable that the Vikings of Scandinavia brought my own bloodline to Scotland along with the Turkish element. It is known that the Vikings visited Istanbul, or as it was known then Constantinople or, as it was known to the Vikings then, Miklegard. In fact, Viking mercenaries served the Byzantine emperors of Constantinople for over two centuries. Did Turks return with the Vikings on their ships up through the Black Sea and the rivers of Russia back to Scandinavia? Did some Vikings establish themselves in Turkey (Asia Minor) and return many years later? Or am I related to that substantial part of the Turkish population that came from Central or Eastern Europe perhaps, or another part of the Ottoman Empire? It is probably impossible to know, and I am simply content in the knowledge that my own mixed heritage includes a strong connection to modern Turkey.

For those of you with Turkish genes, I recommend strongly that you visit the modern Republic of Turkey and help solidify the important links between our two great countries. For those fellow Melungeons who do not have Turkish genes, I recommend that you also visit the modern Republic of Turkey and help solidify the links between our two great countries. Both groups will be rewarded by extraordinary beauty, unbelievable historical riches, fascinating archaeological discoveries, warm hospitality and friendship, unmatched cuisine, and the knowledge that you are playing an important role in bridging differences between cultures and religions and avoiding the threatened “clash of civilizations.”

The contacts and the friendships that you make will be lasting, and you personally can play an important role in strengthening and deepening Turkish-American relations. And you will know, as I know, that the Turks are perhaps the most warm-hearted and friendliest people in the world.

In closing, there is a Turkish proverb that I would like to bring to your attention. I think it speaks to us both as individuals and as nations. I quote: “Ayrilikla olumu cekmisler, ayrilik agir gelmis.” In English: “They weighed separation and death on the scales, and separation was found to be heavier.”

Ladies and gentlemen, the Melungeons are together here in Kingsport. We are bringing together the elements of our own lives and ending the separation that has been felt in our families. I can think of no other group that is better qualified to lead the way in helping all people and all nations lose their sense of separation. I am very proud to be among you. Thank you very much for your time and attention today.